Website review, no card needed
leveros.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202636 issues · 90 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on leveros.com.br, 10 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 290 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 288 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 291 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 303 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 338 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 387 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 412 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 422 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 436 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 417 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 404 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 402 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 401 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 412 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 437 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
950 ms · 408 KiB71 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (408 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
600 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.
Legacy JavaScript
500 ms · 46 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 46 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 184 KiBAbout 184 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 135 KiB10 images could be 135 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 27 KiBAbout 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 81 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Fonts, mais.social and Cloudflare CDN), adding 7 KiB and 1 ms of main-thread time.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 91
91/100Your mobile performance score is 91. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.6 s
A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 185 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 15 ms
15 msYour server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 612 ms
612 msReal visitors wait 612 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Tap response (INP) got 47% slower for real visitors
+47%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 290 ms to 437 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sYour largest element takes 3.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “DIA DO AMIGO”.
15 images without width and height
15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 3.7 s
3.7 sThe page is fully interactive after 3.7 s.
Speed Index: 2.9 s
2.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.9 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003
0.003The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 54 ms
54 msScripts block the page for only 54 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
bc0fa47241dd430d5fb830cc5a407484.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
3 images far larger than shown
202 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example bc0fa47241dd430d5fb830cc5a407484.webp at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 202 KiB.
About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit
0.30 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.30 g of CO₂e: 36.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 1.1 MB in 76 requests
1.1 MBYour homepage downloads 1.1 MB in 76 requests on a phone: images 555 KiB (58), scripts 292 KiB (7) and fonts 135 KiB (4). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
36 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Form elements should have a visible label (2 elements)
Form elements should have a visible label: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 106 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (221 characters)
Your meta description is 221 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
194 internal links, 34 external
The homepage links to 194 pages on leveros.com.br and 34 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Leveros: Loja de Ar-condicionado”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Leveros | A Melhor Loja de Ar-Condicionado do Brasil”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.leveros.com.br/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Store and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.leveros.com.br/xml/produtos.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.leveros.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (688 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
https://www.leveros.com.br/pagina/fale-conosco, https://www.leveros.com.br/minha-conta and https://www.leveros.com.br/minha-conta/lista-desejo all use the title “Leveros”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.leveros.com.br/pagina/lojas-fisicas and https://www.leveros.com.br/pagina/politica-entrega have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.leveros.com.br/minha-conta and https://www.leveros.com.br/minha-conta/lista-desejo use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.leveros.com.br/pagina/lojas-fisicas, whose canonical is https://www.leveros.com.br/pagina/[email protected]. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
11 pages without an H1
https://www.leveros.com.br/pagina/fale-conosco, https://www.leveros.com.br/minha-conta, https://www.leveros.com.br/minha-conta/lista-desejo, https://www.leveros.com.br/ar-condicionado/inverter, https://www.leveros.com.br/ar-condicionado/split and https://www.leveros.com.br/ar-condicionado/cassete and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://www.leveros.com.br/minha-conta and https://www.leveros.com.br/minha-conta/lista-desejo have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 58 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
40 small tap targets
40 of 113 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
7 low-resolution images
7 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 327 words of copy
The homepage carries about 327 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos and 3 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leveros.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2023.
Stack
- Framework
- Nuxt
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Fastly
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on leveros.com.br, including 11 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.