Website review, no card needed

limango-outlet.nl logo

limango-outlet.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202632 issues · 81 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on limango-outlet.nl, 10 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s1.2 sMay 23Nov 71.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.2 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Oct 31, 20261.4 s
Nov 7, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
726 ms226 msMay 23Nov 7284 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026636 ms
May 30, 2026655 ms
Jun 6, 2026668 ms
Jun 13, 2026661 ms
Jun 20, 2026667 ms
Jun 27, 2026629 ms
Jul 4, 2026604 ms
Jul 11, 2026592 ms
Jul 18, 2026588 ms
Jul 25, 2026597 ms
Aug 1, 2026616 ms
Aug 8, 2026638 ms
Aug 15, 2026633 ms
Aug 22, 2026613 ms
Aug 29, 2026611 ms
Sep 5, 2026613 ms
Sep 12, 2026615 ms
Sep 19, 2026644 ms
Sep 26, 2026656 ms
Oct 3, 2026646 ms
Oct 10, 2026556 ms
Oct 17, 2026470 ms
Oct 24, 2026382 ms
Oct 31, 2026323 ms
Nov 7, 2026284 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of limango-outlet.nl (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. limango-outlet.nl at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. limango-outlet.nl at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. limango-outlet.nl at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. limango-outlet.nl at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. limango-outlet.nl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. limango-outlet.nl at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. limango-outlet.nl at 3.3 s3.3 s
  8. limango-outlet.nl at 3.8 s3.8 s

Speed

10 to fix64
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 334 KiB

    About 334 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • 4,602 HTML elements

    The page has 4,602 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 442 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (442 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 64

    64/100

    Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    250 ms · 363 KiB

    18 images could be 363 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    450 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).

  • Main-thread work: 2.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Usercentrics CMP, Constructor.io and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.3 MB and 87 ms of main-thread time.

  • imagekit.io adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    imagekit.io costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 680 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 31 KiB

    About 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    100 ms · 33 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 120 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 401 ms

    401 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 401 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.6 s

    14.6 s

    Your largest element takes 14.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “limango en negen partner (Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd, Googl…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.7 s

    14.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.4 s

    6.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 194 ms

    194 ms

    Real visitors wait 194 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.04

    0.04

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 230 ms

    230 ms

    Real visitors wait 230 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 53% faster for real visitors

    -53%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 636 ms to 284 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 148 ms

    148 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 148 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.7 MB in 123 requests

    2.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 123 requests on a phone: scripts 1,016 KiB (46), images 954 KiB (36) and other files 385 KiB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.78 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.78 g of CO₂e: 93.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9296
  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 128 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 10070
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (67 characters)

    Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “limango - Jouw Shopping Club voor Kinderschoenen, Kindermode & meer”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 195 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 195 pages on limango-outlet.nl and 11 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 110 characters

    Your meta description is 110 characters: “limango: iedere dag de beste merken voor families tot -80% korting ❤️ Nu kosteloos en vrijblijvend registeren!”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.limango.nl/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.limango.nl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,405 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix60
  • 1 page without a title

    https://www.limango.nl/shop/babys has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 3 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.limango.nl/invite, https://www.limango.nl/shop/kinderen and https://www.limango.nl/shop/dames are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.limango.nl/shop all use the title “limango - Jouw Shopping Club voor Kinderschoenen, Kindermode & meer”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 7 pages without a meta description

    https://www.limango.nl/privacy, https://www.limango.nl/invite, https://www.limango.nl/legal-information, https://www.limango.nl/terms, https://www.limango.nl/compliance and https://www.limango.nl/page/wettelijkegarantieenreparatie and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    https://www.limango.nl/family, https://www.limango.nl/invite, https://www.limango.nl/shop, https://www.limango.nl/shop/babys, https://www.limango.nl/shop/kinderen and https://www.limango.nl/shop/dames have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 161 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    11 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    36 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,571 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,571 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Shop”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at limango-outlet.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on limango-outlet.nl, including 14 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25