Website review, no card needed
linedata.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202651 issues · 94 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on linedata.com, 19 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: font display. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 312 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 339 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 359 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 364 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 369 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 332 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 302 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 299 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 322 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 300 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 292 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 282 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.2 s
4.4 s
6.6 s
8.8 s
11.0 s
13.2 s
15.4 s
17.6 s
Speed
Font display
2.9 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.9 s).
Google Tag Manager adds 2.2 s
2.2 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 2.2 s of main-thread work and 682 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 44
44/100Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.7 s
A phone's processor spends 6.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, consentframework.com and Clarity and others), adding 840 KiB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 1.5 MB17 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 339 KiBAbout 339 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 566 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 37 KiBAbout 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
consentframework.com adds 261 ms
261 msconsentframework.com costs a phone 261 ms of main-thread work and 63 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Document request latency
107 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
54 KiB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (54 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
32 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 414 ms
414 msYour server sent the HTML in 414 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.43
0.43For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.43 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 12.8 s
12.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 3.3 s
3.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 3.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 18.7 s
18.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.5 s
4.5 sYour largest element takes 4.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “GestionFlotte-Homepage-P1.jpg”. Most of its time is resource load delay (2.6 s).
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.9 s
1.9 sThe first text or image appears after 1.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 144 ms
144 msReal visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 312 ms to 282 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 22% faster for real visitors
-22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.9 MB in 114 requests
3.9 MBYour homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 114 requests on a phone: images 2.1 MB (33), scripts 1.1 MB (32) and fonts 492 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
13 images below the first screen load straight away
13 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
3 images in older formats
3 images (969 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images far larger than shown
329 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example banner website 14.jpg at 1,440 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 329 KiB.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.12 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.12 g of CO₂e: 133.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
4 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (4 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (4 elements)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Hidden but focusable
17 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (4 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (3 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (4 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 29 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 13 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found ((untyped) and Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “block has no @type”.
20 links with vague text
20 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
142 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 142 pages on linedata.com and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 145 characters
Your meta description is 145 characters: “Global solutions provider dedicated to the investment management and credit community. Linedata provides software, serv…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Homepage”.
Title: 53 characters
Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Financial Technology, Services & Solutions | Linedata”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.linedata.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.linedata.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.linedata.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,090 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.linedata.com/our-locations, https://www.linedata.com/job-offers and https://www.linedata.com/investor-relations have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.linedata.com/why-linedata/corporate-responsibility and https://www.linedata.com/why-linedata/ethical-company use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.linedata.com/node/3778, whose canonical is https://www.linedata.com/linedata-reduces-environmental-impact-its-website. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://www.linedata.com/job-offers has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.linedata.com/why-linedata/innovating-intersection-tech-and-humanity and https://www.linedata.com/node/3778 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 75 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 20 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to script at 'https://mktdplp102cdn.azureedge.net/public/latest/js/ws-tracking.js?v=1.74.1038.0' from origin 'ht…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,128 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,128 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Why join us”, “Order Management and Trading” and “Learn more about our events and webinars”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 15 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Umami.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
15 cookies set on arrival
15Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
31 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at linedata.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Drupal
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Founded
- 1998
- Headquarters
- Paris
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on linedata.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.