Website review, no card needed
lmcompanies.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202625 issues · 70 checks
This review found 25 issues worth fixing on lmcompanies.com, 5 of them high impact, across 70 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 8.2 MB in 141 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
6.2 MB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.2 MB).
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (adp.com, JSDelivr CDN and website-files.com and others), adding 8.2 MB and 300 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 75
75/100Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 741 KiBAbout 741 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
850 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.
website-files.com adds 26 ms
26 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 26 ms of main-thread work and 7.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 289 KiB9 images could be 289 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
adp.com adds 213 ms
213 msadp.com costs a phone 213 ms of main-thread work and 690 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 23 KiBAbout 23 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 135 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
42 KiB42 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 541 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.3 s
6.3 sYour largest element takes 6.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 8.8 s
8.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 8.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
5 checks passed
Largest content (LCP) got 35% faster for real visitors
-35%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 159 ms
159 msScripts block the page for only 159 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 2.6 s
2.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.6 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.011
0.011The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.011, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.2 MB in 141 requests
8.2 MBYour homepage downloads 8.2 MB in 141 requests on a phone: media 6.1 MB (1), images 742 KiB (24) and scripts 735 KiB (102). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
72 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 6ab1919779309969f82e8a21_melons.avif at 800 px wide, shown at 110 px. Resized copies would save about 72 KiB.
About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit
2.33 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.33 g of CO₂e: 280.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
15 tap targets too small
15 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 29 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (13 characters)
Your title is only 13 characters: “L&M Companies”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.lmcompanies.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
25 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 25 pages on lmcompanies.com and 14 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 142 characters
Your meta description is 142 characters: “Family-owned fresh produce growers offering tomatoes, potatoes, peppers, onions, melons, cabbage, and apples. Full-serv…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “We are proud of our produce and the people who grow it.”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.lmcompanies.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (452 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without an H1
https://www.lmcompanies.com/contact-us and https://www.lmcompanies.com/our-brands have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
13 internal pages checked
We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 31 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error: <svg> attribute width: Expected length, "auto".”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
About 374 words of copy
The homepage carries about 374 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lmcompanies.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Hosting
- Webflow
Company
- Employees
- 140
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 25 issues on lmcompanies.com, including 11 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.