Website review, no card needed
logcp.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202641 issues · 81 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on logcp.com.br, 16 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 161 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 159 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 169 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.7 s · 815 KiBAbout 815 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.7 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.7 s).
Render-blocking requests
1.3 s13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.
Mobile performance score: 49
49/100Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.0 s
A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and cloudflare.com and others), adding 1.4 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
570 ms · 159 KiBAbout 159 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 570 ms faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 617 ms
617 msYouTube costs a phone 617 ms of main-thread work and 990 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 341 ms
341 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 341 ms of main-thread work and 336 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,727 HTML elements
The page has 1,727 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 210 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
12 KiB1 image could be 12 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
9 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 146 ms
146 msYour server sent the HTML in 146 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.1 s
6.1 sReal visitors wait 6.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 30.8 s
30.8 sYour largest element takes 30.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Somos a Log, a única desenvolvedora e gestora de galpões lo…”.
Speed Index: 16.1 s
16.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 16.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 31.0 s
31.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user INP: 211 ms
211 msReal visitors wait 211 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.19
0.19For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.19 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.167
0.167The layout shifts by 0.167 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 328 ms
328 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 328 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 161 ms to 169 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Largest content (LCP) got 21% faster for real visitors
-21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.3 MB in 68 requests
5.3 MBYour homepage downloads 5.3 MB in 68 requests on a phone: images 2.1 MB (8), scripts 1.5 MB (23) and other files 656 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit
1.50 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.50 g of CO₂e: 180.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
54 H1 headlines
There are 54 <h1> headlines (“Log Fortaleza III”, “Log Gravataí II” and “Log São José do Rio Preto”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
92 internal links, 17 external
The homepage links to 92 pages on logcp.com.br and 17 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 106 characters
Your meta description is 106 characters: “Somos a Log,a única desenvolvedora e gestora de galpões logísticos presente em todas as regiões do Brasil.”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Log - Movimentamos negócios de Norte a Sul do Brasil”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://logcp.com.br/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://logcp.com.br/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
9 pages without a meta description
/empreendimentos, /esg, /etica-e-integridade, /empreendimentos-log/log-fortaleza-iii-2, /empreendimentos-log/log-gravatai-ii and /empreendimentos-log/log-sao-jose-do-rio-preto and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
7 pages slow to respond
/empreendimentos, /esg, /empreendimentos-log/log-fortaleza-iii-2, /empreendimentos-log/log-gravatai-ii, /empreendimentos-log/log-sao-jose-do-rio-preto and /empreendimentos-log/log-joinville and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
2 small tap targets
2 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “(intermediate value)(intermediate value)(...) is not a function”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
A 8-field form
Your longest form asks for 8 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 96 words
The homepage has only about 96 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at logcp.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on logcp.com.br, including 22 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.