Website review, no card needed

logista.com logo

logista.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202637 issues · 82 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on logista.com, 11 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: minify JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.2 sMay 16Oct 311.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.3 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Oct 31, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
129 ms92 msMay 16Oct 3198 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026106 ms
May 23, 2026103 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 2026104 ms
Jun 20, 2026112 ms
Jun 27, 2026114 ms
Jul 4, 2026125 ms
Jul 11, 2026125 ms
Jul 18, 2026118 ms
Jul 25, 2026115 ms
Aug 1, 2026105 ms
Aug 8, 2026103 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 202699 ms
Aug 29, 202699 ms
Sep 5, 202698 ms
Sep 12, 202697 ms
Sep 19, 202697 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 202697 ms
Oct 10, 202696 ms
Oct 17, 202696 ms
Oct 24, 202697 ms
Oct 31, 202698 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of logista.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. logista.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. logista.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. logista.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. logista.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. logista.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. logista.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. logista.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  8. logista.com at 3.4 s3.4 s

Speed

10 to fix52
  • Minify JavaScript

    7.5 s · 1.1 MB

    1.1 MB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    7.3 s · 919 KiB

    About 919 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.0 MB

    18 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (eurolandir.com, Google Tag Manager and Clarity and others), adding 2.4 MB and 749 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    700 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 700 ms).

  • eurolandir.com adds 474 ms

    474 ms

    eurolandir.com costs a phone 474 ms of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    310 ms · 61 KiB

    About 61 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 202 ms

    202 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 202 ms of main-thread work and 324 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 208 KiB

    14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (208 KiB).

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 161 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 679 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 25 ms

    25 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • First Contentful Paint: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 11.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    Your largest element takes 11.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Logista is one of the leading logistics operators in Europe…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.5 s

    24.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.1 s

    13.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 98 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 87 ms

    87 ms

    Real visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 555 ms

    555 ms

    Real visitors wait 555 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 192 ms

    192 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 192 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix28
  • Page weight: 5.7 MB in 99 requests

    5.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 99 requests on a phone: images 2.6 MB (24), scripts 2.2 MB (34) and fonts 699 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Presentación de resultados FY2026_EN_Banner Web (1).png weighs 1.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 10 images in older formats

    10 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 8 images below the first screen load straight away

    8 images further down the page (893 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    18 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 10.jpg at 1,290 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 18 KiB.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.63 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.63 g of CO₂e: 195.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9697
  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8579
  • Title is long (67 characters)

    Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Integrated Logistics and Efficient Distribution in Europe | Logista”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (177 characters)

    Your meta description is 177 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 107 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 107 pages on logista.com and 4 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Your partner along the way all the way”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.logista.com/en/home.html.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.logista.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (520 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.logista.com/llms.txt (16 KiB, 45 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 6 pages share 3 titles

    https://www.logista.com/en/home/join-us.html and https://www.logista.com/en/home/join-us/our-values.html all use the title “Our Values”, and 2 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.logista.com/en/home/join-us/careers.html has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages share a meta description

    https://www.logista.com/en/home/join-us.html and https://www.logista.com/en/home/join-us/our-values.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.logista.com/en/home/join-us.html, whose canonical is https://www.logista.com/en/home/join-us/our-values.html. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.logista.com/en/home/media/corporate-video.html has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 491 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 491 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact us” and “Join us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at logista.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Compania De Distribucion Integral Logista, SA

Company

Headquarters
Leganes

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on logista.com, including 15 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25