Website review, no card needed

lolipop.ch logo

lolipop.ch website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202630 issues · 78 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on lolipop.ch, 9 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.1 s828 msMay 23Nov 7859 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.0 s
May 30, 20261.0 s
Jun 6, 20261.1 s
Jun 13, 20261.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.0 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.0 s
Aug 1, 20261.0 s
Aug 8, 2026987 ms
Aug 15, 2026969 ms
Aug 22, 2026979 ms
Aug 29, 2026989 ms
Sep 5, 2026999 ms
Sep 12, 2026993 ms
Sep 19, 2026966 ms
Sep 26, 2026954 ms
Oct 3, 2026929 ms
Oct 10, 2026934 ms
Oct 17, 2026942 ms
Oct 24, 2026921 ms
Oct 31, 2026895 ms
Nov 7, 2026859 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
133 ms100 msMay 23Nov 7126 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026105 ms
May 30, 2026106 ms
Jun 6, 2026104 ms
Jun 13, 2026107 ms
Jun 20, 2026107 ms
Jun 27, 2026112 ms
Jul 4, 2026112 ms
Jul 11, 2026112 ms
Jul 18, 2026120 ms
Jul 25, 2026119 ms
Aug 1, 2026121 ms
Aug 8, 2026122 ms
Aug 15, 2026120 ms
Aug 22, 2026126 ms
Aug 29, 2026127 ms
Sep 5, 2026127 ms
Sep 12, 2026127 ms
Sep 19, 2026121 ms
Sep 26, 2026122 ms
Oct 3, 2026123 ms
Oct 10, 2026129 ms
Oct 17, 2026129 ms
Oct 24, 2026129 ms
Oct 31, 2026128 ms
Nov 7, 2026126 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of lolipop.ch (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. lolipop.ch at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. lolipop.ch at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. lolipop.ch at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. lolipop.ch at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. lolipop.ch at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. lolipop.ch at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. lolipop.ch at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. lolipop.ch at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

7 to fix76
  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 2.0 MB

    45 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 76

    76/100

    Your mobile performance score is 76. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 174 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (174 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 169 KiB

    About 169 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • 2,999 HTML elements

    The page has 2,999 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 2.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 955 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Clarity, Klaviyo and Shopify and others), adding 538 KiB and 288 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 14 KiB

    About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    79 KiB

    79 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 79 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    26 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 10 ms

    10 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Your largest element takes 6.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors

    +20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 126 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

10 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 121 ms

    121 ms

    Real visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 301 ms

    301 ms

    Real visitors wait 301 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 0.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.051

    0.051

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.051, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 52 ms

    52 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 52 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix69
  • Page weight: 4.7 MB in 238 requests

    4.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 238 requests on a phone: images 3.0 MB (51), scripts 760 KiB (79) and other files 720 KiB (83). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    xmas_Deko.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (218 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.33 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.33 g of CO₂e: 159.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9395
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 22 links without text

    22 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 76 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10088
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “LOLIPOP”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization, Product and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: url is not an absolute URL ("www.lolipop.ch")”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 260 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 260 pages on lolipop.ch and 5 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 138 characters

    Your meta description is 138 characters: “Entdecke über 1000 Süssigkeiten aus der ganzen Welt auf LOLIPOP.CH ✓ Online oder im Store ✓ Die neusten Trends ✓ Liefer…”.

  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “LOLIPOP | Süssigkeiten & Snacks – TikTok Trends, 24h Lieferung”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.lolipop.ch/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.lolipop.ch/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,401 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.lolipop.ch/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    https://www.lolipop.ch/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.lolipop.ch/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.lolipop.ch/customer_authentication/redirect and https://www.lolipop.ch/collections/all have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.lolipop.ch/customer_authentication/redirect has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 133 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

Best practices

Google 96100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    41 of 41 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 747 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 747 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 45 short forms

    45 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 17 cookies set on arrival

    17

    Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 33 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 33 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at lolipop.ch, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 9 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Rapid Search Bar Filter · Judge Me Reviews · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Seo Manager Venntov · Microsoft Clarity · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Free Shipping Bar · Simple Bundle · elfsight.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on lolipop.ch, including 11 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25