Website review, no card needed

loreland.com.ph logo

loreland.com.ph website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202652 issues · 86 checks

This review found 52 issues worth fixing on loreland.com.ph, 21 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s1.3 sMay 2Oct 172.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.0 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
195 ms76 msMay 2Oct 17181 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202695 ms
May 9, 202694 ms
May 16, 202695 ms
May 23, 202695 ms
May 30, 202696 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 202694 ms
Jun 20, 202694 ms
Jun 27, 202691 ms
Jul 4, 202690 ms
Jul 11, 202697 ms
Jul 18, 2026103 ms
Jul 25, 2026110 ms
Aug 1, 2026113 ms
Sep 19, 2026122 ms
Sep 26, 2026153 ms
Oct 3, 2026153 ms
Oct 10, 2026170 ms
Oct 17, 2026181 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of loreland.com.ph (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. loreland.com.ph at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. loreland.com.ph at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. loreland.com.ph at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. loreland.com.ph at 3.9 s3.9 s
  5. loreland.com.ph at 4.8 s4.8 s
  6. loreland.com.ph at 5.8 s5.8 s
  7. loreland.com.ph at 6.8 s6.8 s
  8. loreland.com.ph at 7.7 s7.7 s

Speed

13 to fix28
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.5 s · 1.4 MB

    34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.9 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.3 s · 397 KiB

    About 397 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    YouTube costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 974 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 28

    28/100

    Your mobile performance score is 28 (desktop: 54). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 2.1 MB and 3.7 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Facebook adds 804 ms

    804 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 804 ms of main-thread work and 277 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 644 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google CDN adds 405 ms

    405 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 405 ms of main-thread work and 388 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    300 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 300 ms).

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 37 KiB

    37 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Improve image delivery

    178 KiB

    2 images could be 178 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Document request latency

    34 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 54 but mobile only 28. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 224 ms

    224 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 224 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

14 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 14.4 s

    14.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.0 s

    20.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Your largest element takes 5.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “About-Us”.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.15

    0.15

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 86% slower for real visitors

    +86%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 181 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 25% slower for real visitors

    +25%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.129

    0.129

    The layout shifts by 0.129 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

1 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 181 ms

    181 ms

    Real visitors wait 181 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix78
  • Page weight: 3.3 MB in 74 requests

    3.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 74 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (21), images 507 KiB (12) and stylesheets 402 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (378 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (420 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.94 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.94 g of CO₂e: 112.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7388
  • 11 text elements with low contrast

    11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 9 images without alt text

    9 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Headings should not be empty (27 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 27 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h3 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 7563
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (20 characters)

    Your title is only 20 characters: “Loreland Farm Resort”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“”, “” and “”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.loreland.com.ph/?sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 22 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 22 pages on loreland.com.ph and 7 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.loreland.com.ph/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (205 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix0
  • 7 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.loreland.com.ph/home, https://www.loreland.com.ph/cottages, https://www.loreland.com.ph/rooms, https://www.loreland.com.ph/events, https://www.loreland.com.ph/facilities and https://www.loreland.com.ph/promos and 1 other, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 7 internal pages checked

    We fetched 7 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7376
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.loreland.com.ph/.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “conditionizr is not defined”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    25 of 25 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Only about 242 words

    The homepage has only about 242 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT” and “BOOK NOW”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Book Now”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 20 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at loreland.com.ph, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 52 issues on loreland.com.ph, including 27 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25