Website review, no card needed

madisa.com logo

madisa.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202659 issues · 92 checks

This review found 59 issues worth fixing on madisa.com, 25 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
10.7 s4.0 sMay 9Oct 249.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20265.8 s
May 16, 20266.0 s
May 23, 20265.6 s
May 30, 20265.2 s
Jun 6, 20264.9 s
Jun 13, 20264.9 s
Jun 20, 20264.7 s
Jun 27, 20264.8 s
Jul 4, 20264.9 s
Jul 11, 20265.4 s
Jul 18, 20267.0 s
Jul 25, 20268.0 s
Aug 1, 20268.5 s
Aug 8, 20268.7 s
Aug 15, 20269.0 s
Aug 22, 20269.6 s
Aug 29, 202610.0 s
Sep 5, 20269.8 s
Sep 12, 20269.7 s
Sep 19, 20269.8 s
Sep 26, 20269.6 s
Oct 3, 20269.7 s
Oct 10, 20269.4 s
Oct 17, 20269.2 s
Oct 24, 20269.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
234 ms158 msMay 9Oct 24217 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026167 ms
May 16, 2026169 ms
May 23, 2026170 ms
May 30, 2026170 ms
Jun 6, 2026174 ms
Jun 13, 2026179 ms
Jun 20, 2026179 ms
Jun 27, 2026184 ms
Jul 4, 2026192 ms
Jul 11, 2026188 ms
Jul 18, 2026187 ms
Jul 25, 2026188 ms
Aug 1, 2026184 ms
Aug 8, 2026191 ms
Aug 15, 2026199 ms
Aug 22, 2026206 ms
Aug 29, 2026211 ms
Sep 5, 2026213 ms
Sep 12, 2026212 ms
Sep 19, 2026213 ms
Sep 26, 2026217 ms
Oct 3, 2026220 ms
Oct 10, 2026225 ms
Oct 17, 2026213 ms
Oct 24, 2026217 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of madisa.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. madisa.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  2. madisa.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  3. madisa.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  4. madisa.com at 5.4 s5.4 s
  5. madisa.com at 6.8 s6.8 s
  6. madisa.com at 8.1 s8.1 s
  7. madisa.com at 9.5 s9.5 s
  8. madisa.com at 10.8 s10.8 s

Speed

15 to fix16
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    11.6 s · 2.4 MB

    105 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.4 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.0 s · 1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.7 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.7 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.6 s · 334 KiB

    2 images could be 334 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 210 KiB

    About 210 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 16

    16/100

    Your mobile performance score is 16. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, hsappstatic.net and Google CDN and others), adding 3.3 MB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 824 ms

    824 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 824 ms of main-thread work and 944 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • hsappstatic.net adds 488 ms

    488 ms

    hsappstatic.net costs a phone 488 ms of main-thread work and 727 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 463 ms

    463 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 463 ms of main-thread work and 736 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 505 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Hubspot adds 408 ms

    408 ms

    Hubspot costs a phone 408 ms of main-thread work and 572 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Hotjar adds 298 ms

    298 ms

    Hotjar costs a phone 298 ms of main-thread work and 65 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,016 HTML elements

    The page has 2,016 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 45 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 55 ms

    55 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 55 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

15 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    Real visitors wait 5.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.30

    0.30

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.30 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 34.0 s

    34.0 s

    Your largest element takes 34.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 34.1 s

    34.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 34.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.322

    0.322

    The layout shifts by 0.322 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 275 ms

    275 ms

    Real visitors wait 275 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 28% slower for real visitors

    +28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 167 ms to 217 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 56% slower for real visitors

    +56%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.8 s to 9.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Images and page weight

4 to fix35
  • Page weight: 7.9 MB in 193 requests

    7.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.9 MB in 193 requests on a phone: scripts 3.6 MB (105), images 3.3 MB (36) and other files 381 KiB (36). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    UT-BANNER-HOME-MADISA_Mesa-de-trabajo-5.png weighs 1.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (2.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    54 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example MADISA-logo-vector.png at 3,052 px wide, shown at 173 px. Resized copies would save about 54 KiB.

  • About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.23 g of CO₂e: 268.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8188
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 38 text elements with low contrast

    38 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 19 images without alt text

    19 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (67 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 67 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (3 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8377
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Meta description is long (161 characters)

    Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: sameAs is an empty list”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 212 internal links, 21 external

    The homepage links to 212 pages on madisa.com and 21 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “MADISA CAT Maquinaria, refacciones, servicio | Venta y Renta”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.madisa.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.madisa.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,062 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.madisa.com/promociones is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.madisa.com/servicios-en-linea, https://www.madisa.com/promociones, https://www.madisa.com/categoria-producto/compresores-de-aire/sistemas-de-vacio, https://www.madisa.com/categoria-producto/equipo-para-concreto-y-asfalto/vehiculo-autoconcretero and https://www.madisa.com/categoria-producto/plantas-de-asfalto have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.madisa.com/categoria-producto/maquinaria-pesada/compresores-portatiles, whose canonical is https://www.madisa.com/categoria-producto/compresores-de-aire/compresores-portatiles. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.madisa.com/promociones has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.madisa.com/promociones took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 184 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 6985
  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected token '&'”.

  • 3 low-resolution images

    3 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 394 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 394 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 3 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 20 cookies set on arrival

    20

    Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 36 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 36 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at madisa.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Hosting
Sucuri

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 59 issues on madisa.com, including 30 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25