Website review, no card needed
magellanpower.com.au website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202643 issues · 89 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on magellanpower.com.au, 14 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 117 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 114 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 103 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.5 s
2.2 s
3.0 s
3.7 s
4.5 s
5.2 s
6.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
6.4 s · 3.3 MB54 images could be 3.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.0 s25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.4 s · 430 KiBAbout 430 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 50
50/100Your mobile performance score is 50 (desktop: 70). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 327 ms
327 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 327 ms of main-thread work and 323 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 51 KiBAbout 51 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.1 s
A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 865 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,974 HTML elements
The page has 1,974 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google CDN adds 87 ms
87 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 87 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Google Analytics and others), adding 742 KiB and 487 ms of main-thread time.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 203 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 34 KiB34 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 30 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (30 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 32.0 s
32.0 sYour largest element takes 32.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “About Us Since 1991, Magellan Power has specialised in desi…”.
Time to Interactive: 33.4 s
33.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.1 s
9.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.11
0.11For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
73 images without width and height
73 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 410 ms
410 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 410 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
3 checks passed
Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 117 ms to 103 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 30% faster for real visitors
-30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 34.3 MB in 218 requests
34.3 MBYour homepage downloads 34.3 MB in 218 requests on a phone: media 26.3 MB (3), images 6.8 MB (154) and scripts 1,009 KiB (32). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
40 images in older formats
40 images (4.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
17 images below the first screen load straight away
17 images further down the page (1.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 9.7 g of CO₂ per visit
9.72 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.72 g of CO₂e: 1166.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
19 text elements with low contrast
19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
11 images without alt text
11 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (48 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 48 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
11 links without text
11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (2 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h1 → h4 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 9 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“POWERING AUSTRALIA'S CRITICAL INDUSTRIES” and “POWERING AUSTRALIA'S CRITICAL INDUSTRIES”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (161 characters)
Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
128 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 128 pages on magellanpower.com.au and 16 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Australian Industrial UPS & Power Systems | Magellan Power”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://magellanpower.com.au/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://magellanpower.com.au/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://magellanpower.com.au/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,791 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://magellanpower.com.au/support and https://magellanpower.com.au/batteries-and-load-banks have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://magellanpower.com.au/karri has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “$ is not a function”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 34 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 12-field form
Your longest form asks for 12 fields (11 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,281 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,281 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More”.
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn More” and “Request Product Manual”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at magellanpower.com.au, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on magellanpower.com.au, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.