Website review, no card needed

makes.jp logo

makes.jp website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202649 issues · 94 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on makes.jp, 21 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.0 s906 msApr 25Oct 10959 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 2026974 ms
May 2, 2026977 ms
May 9, 2026991 ms
May 16, 2026983 ms
May 23, 2026972 ms
May 30, 2026996 ms
Jun 6, 2026990 ms
Jun 13, 2026988 ms
Jun 20, 2026987 ms
Jun 27, 2026967 ms
Jul 4, 2026948 ms
Jul 11, 2026943 ms
Jul 18, 2026956 ms
Jul 25, 2026949 ms
Aug 1, 2026944 ms
Aug 8, 2026933 ms
Aug 15, 2026919 ms
Aug 22, 2026918 ms
Aug 29, 2026922 ms
Sep 5, 2026930 ms
Sep 12, 2026926 ms
Sep 19, 2026929 ms
Sep 26, 2026937 ms
Oct 3, 2026954 ms
Oct 10, 2026959 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
106 ms98 msApr 25Oct 10105 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026104 ms
May 2, 2026104 ms
May 9, 2026103 ms
May 16, 2026102 ms
May 23, 2026102 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 2026102 ms
Jun 20, 2026101 ms
Jun 27, 2026100 ms
Jul 4, 2026100 ms
Jul 11, 2026102 ms
Jul 18, 2026102 ms
Jul 25, 2026102 ms
Aug 1, 2026100 ms
Aug 8, 202699 ms
Aug 15, 202699 ms
Aug 22, 202699 ms
Aug 29, 2026100 ms
Sep 5, 2026102 ms
Sep 12, 2026103 ms
Sep 19, 2026103 ms
Sep 26, 2026104 ms
Oct 3, 2026104 ms
Oct 10, 2026105 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of makes.jp (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. makes.jp at 1.8 s1.8 s
  2. makes.jp at 3.6 s3.6 s
  3. makes.jp at 5.5 s5.5 s
  4. makes.jp at 7.3 s7.3 s
  5. makes.jp at 9.1 s9.1 s
  6. makes.jp at 10.9 s10.9 s
  7. makes.jp at 12.8 s12.8 s
  8. makes.jp at 14.6 s14.6 s

Speed

12 to fix54
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    14.0 s · 20.4 MB

    269 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (20.4 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    8.8 s · 16.4 MB

    91 images could be 16.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    7.2 s · 2.8 MB

    About 2.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    6.9 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.9 s.

  • Main-thread work: 5.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and worldshopping.jp and others), adding 15.4 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.

  • staff-start.com adds 43 ms

    43 ms

    staff-start.com costs a phone 43 ms of main-thread work and 11.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 717 ms

    717 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 717 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • worldshopping.jp adds 518 ms

    518 ms

    worldshopping.jp costs a phone 518 ms of main-thread work and 1.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 552 ms

    552 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 552 ms of main-thread work and 836 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,072 HTML elements

    The page has 2,072 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 46 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 46 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 22 KiB

    22 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 151 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 25.2 s

    25.2 s

    Your largest element takes 25.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “2026aki”.

  • Speed Index: 46.6 s

    46.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 46.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 97.3 s

    97.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 97.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 19 images without width and height

    19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 105 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 137 ms

    137 ms

    Real visitors wait 137 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 409 ms

    409 ms

    Real visitors wait 409 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 140 ms

    140 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 140 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.017

    0.017

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.017, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 29.2 MB in 603 requests

    29.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 29.2 MB in 603 requests on a phone: images 21.3 MB (323), scripts 5.4 MB (88) and fonts 1.7 MB (56). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images over 500 KB

    6 images weigh 5.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    3.6 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Pillings_SP08.jpg at 4,167 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 3.6 MB.

  • 13 images in older formats

    13 images (7.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (770 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 8.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.28 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.28 g of CO₂e: 994.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 6685
  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 10 buttons without a name

    10 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • [role]s are not contained by their required parent element

    [role]s are not contained by their required parent element (2 elements).

  • Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

    Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (1 element).

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (9 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 10 links without text

    10 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 6 form fields without a label

    6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

    button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names. (1 element).

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 141 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 9271
  • Title is short (18 characters)

    Your title is only 18 characters: “MAKES ONLINE STORE”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.makes.jp/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 306 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 306 pages on makes.jp and 3 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Meta description: 130 characters

    Your meta description is 130 characters: “富山の中心エリアで現在7店舗のセレクトショップを展開 国内外のブランドを正規ルートでのみ取扱い それぞれ異なるコンセプトを発信 MAKES ONLINE STORE はその全てのショップを集約し 様々な世界観のブランドアイテムをジャンルを…”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.makes.jp/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (126 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.makes.jp/contact and https://www.makes.jp/c/mens/sale_m have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.makes.jp/contact and https://www.makes.jp/c/mens/sale_m took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 181 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 74 small tap targets

    74 of 157 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “ga is not defined”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Only about 204 words

    The homepage has only about 204 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 35 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at makes.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on makes.jp, including 17 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25