Website review, no card needed
malva.com.pe website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202638 issues · 80 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on malva.com.pe, 14 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74C- #64,980 of 92,629 reviewed websitesbeats 26%
- #38,538 of 49,258 online storesbeats 18%
- #35,992 of 44,431 Shopify storesbeats 16%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 339 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 367 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 359 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 365 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 384 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 380 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 433 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 460 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 485 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 480 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 452 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 431 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 371 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 356 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 339 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 346 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 375 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 431 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 455 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 465 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 479 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 502 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 543 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 568 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 659 KiBAbout 659 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
2.1 s · 730 KiB9 images could be 730 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (JSDelivr CDN, Clarity and kiwisizing.com and others), adding 995 KiB and 942 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Duplicated JavaScript
500 ms · 124 KiB124 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
500 ms · 122 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (122 KiB).
JSDelivr CDN adds 448 ms
448 msJSDelivr CDN costs a phone 448 ms of main-thread work and 86 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
400 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 400 ms.
Main-thread work: 3.5 s
A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,197 HTML elements
The page has 2,197 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Shopify adds 91 ms
91 msShopify costs a phone 91 ms of main-thread work and 575 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
200 ms · 38 KiBAbout 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 217 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 32.4 s
32.4 sYour largest element takes 32.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 32.8 s
32.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.7 s
11.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 345 ms
345 msReal visitors wait 345 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 57% slower for real visitors
+57%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 339 ms to 568 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 54% slower for real visitors
+54%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 351 ms
351 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 351 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 721 ms
721 msReal visitors wait 721 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.9 MB in 207 requests
6.9 MBYour homepage downloads 6.9 MB in 207 requests on a phone: images 4.8 MB (20), scripts 858 KiB (52) and other files 752 KiB (95). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 2.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
2.3 MB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Veja.jpg at 3,840 px wide, shown at 177 px. Resized copies would save about 2.3 MB.
12 images in older formats
12 images (4.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (31 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.96 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.96 g of CO₂e: 234.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
49 links without text
49 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
19 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 20 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 19 passed and 1 failed. 29 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://malvaonline.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
297 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 297 pages on malva.com.pe and 5 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 131 characters
Your meta description is 131 characters: “Compra en Malva la mejor ropa, calzado y accesorios para mujer y hombre de los diseñadores más reconocidos del mundo y …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Malva Perú tiene alma de curador”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Malva Perú | Ropa, calzado y accesorios de diseñador”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://pe.malvaonline.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,356 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://pe.malvaonline.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
14 pages without a meta description
https://pe.malvaonline.com/collections/new-in-mujer, https://pe.malvaonline.com/collections/novedades-ropa, https://pe.malvaonline.com/collections/novedades-calzado, https://pe.malvaonline.com/collections/novedades-bolsos-y-carteras, https://pe.malvaonline.com/pages/the-colombian-edit and https://pe.malvaonline.com/collections/vestidos and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 127 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
31 small tap targets
31 of 86 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “SyntaxError: Failed to execute 'querySelector' on 'Document': '.content-menus # .container-featured-collection .title-f…”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 310 words of copy
The homepage carries about 310 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
31 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at malva.com.pe, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Microsoft Clarity · Hulk Form Builder · Mercado Pago Antifraud Plus · Air Reviews · Mercadopago Pf App · Forms · Ctx Whatsapp Chat Marketing · kiwisizing.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on malva.com.pe, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.