Website review, no card needed
malo.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202635 issues · 82 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on malo.com, 15 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 11.2 MB in 452 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80B- #35,765 of 91,254 reviewed websitesbeats 55%
- #22,316 of 48,138 online storesbeats 47%
- #21,350 of 43,343 Shopify storesbeats 44%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 161 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 163 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 166 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 158 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 182 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
iubenda adds 1.1 s
1.1 siubenda costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 129 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47 (desktop: 62). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 8.8 s
A phone's processor spends 8.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
4,093 HTML elements
The page has 4,093 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (iubenda, Google Tag Manager and Shopify and others), adding 1.8 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
645 KiBAbout 645 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Google Tag Manager adds 360 ms
360 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 360 ms of main-thread work and 320 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 253 ms
253 msShopify costs a phone 253 ms of main-thread work and 770 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 299 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
110 ms · 23 KiBAbout 23 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 110 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
100 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 100 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
71 KiB18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (71 KiB).
Improve image delivery
22 KiB2 images could be 22 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify JavaScript
10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Duplicated JavaScript
8 KiB8 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 76 ms
76 msYour server sent the HTML in 76 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 20.8 s
20.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s
1.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sYour largest element takes 5.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 6.6 s
6.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user TTFB: 902 ms
902 msReal visitors wait 902 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 157 ms to 182 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 131 ms
131 msReal visitors wait 131 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.2 MB in 452 requests
11.2 MBYour homepage downloads 11.2 MB in 452 requests on a phone: media 7.3 MB (6), scripts 1.8 MB (136) and other files 1.5 MB (270). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (44 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.2 g of CO₂ per visit
3.17 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.17 g of CO₂e: 381.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 2 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Meta description is long (247 characters)
Your meta description is 247 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
99 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 99 pages on malo.com and 2 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 30 characters
Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “MALO | Luxury Italian Knitwear”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://malo.com/en-us.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and Website.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://malo.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details; logo would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,981 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
2 linked pages hidden from search
/en-us/pages/malo-house and /customer_authentication/redirect are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/en-us/products/dxd060f1b02e3638 and /en-us/products/uxd158f1a16e0091 all use the title “Cashmere half-zip polo shirt”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
8 pages without a meta description
/en-us/pages/lookbook-fw-26, /en-us/collections/women-fw26, /en-us/collections/men-fw26, /en-us/pages/journal, /en-us/pages/stories and /en-us/pages/malo-house and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 pages without an H1
/en-us/pages/legacy-1972, /en-us/pages/journal, /en-us/pages/stories, /en-us/pages/malo-house, /en-us/pages/malo-forever and /customer_authentication/redirect have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Best practices
14 small tap targets
14 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 273 words of copy
The homepage carries about 273 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Request an Invitation”, “SUBSCRIBE” and “Contact Us”.
5 short forms
5 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
22 cookies set on arrival
22Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
41 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: iubenda
A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at malo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on malo.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.