Website review, no card needed
mammothbrand.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202633 issues · 76 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on mammothbrand.com, 14 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.8 s
2.3 s
2.9 s
3.5 s
4.1 s
4.7 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.7 s · 1.9 MB42 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.9 MB).
Render-blocking requests
6.1 s19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.1 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.4 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.8 s · 265 KiBAbout 265 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Vimeo, Google Tag Manager and Cookie-Script.com and others), adding 6.1 MB and 554 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 50). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
983 KiB2 images could be 983 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Vimeo adds 275 ms
275 msVimeo costs a phone 275 ms of main-thread work and 5.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.5 s
A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 229 ms
229 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 229 ms of main-thread work and 586 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
250 ms · 43 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 43 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 123 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 24.8 s
24.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.6 s
6.6 sThe first text or image appears after 6.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.6 s
7.6 sYour largest element takes 7.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “A brand consultancy, specialising in clever answers to chal…”.
Speed Index: 12.6 s
12.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
2 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 121 ms
121 msScripts block the page for only 121 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.9 MB in 130 requests
7.9 MBYour homepage downloads 7.9 MB in 130 requests on a phone: other files 4.1 MB (59), scripts 2.4 MB (35) and images 1.1 MB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
OnterrisNew-scaled.png weighs 985 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image far larger than shown
812 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example OnterrisNew-scaled.png at 2,560 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 812 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (985 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit
2.25 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.25 g of CO₂e: 270.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 7 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (203 characters)
Your meta description is 203 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
26 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 26 pages on mammothbrand.com and 6 external pages.
7 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “A brand consultancy, specialising in clever answers to challenging questions.”.
Title: 50 characters
Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Global Brand Consultancy & Design Agency | Mammoth”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://mammothbrand.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://mammothbrand.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (217 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://mammothbrand.com/llms.txt (2 KiB, 19 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
https://mammothbrand.com/project/onterris, https://mammothbrand.com/project/citeline, https://mammothbrand.com/project/university-of-warwick, https://mammothbrand.com/project/mmit and https://mammothbrand.com/project/university-of-birmingham have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
https://mammothbrand.com/our-work, https://mammothbrand.com/mind-the-crest-why-heritage-reigns-supreme-in-university-logos, https://mammothbrand.com/wheres-the-pride-why-uk-universities-need-a-sporting-wake-up-call and https://mammothbrand.com/careers have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://mammothbrand.com/contact and https://mammothbrand.com/careers have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
12 internal pages checked
We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 198 words
The homepage has only about 198 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Talk to us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mammothbrand.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on mammothbrand.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.