Website review, no card needed
mankenberg.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202621 issues · 76 checks
This review found 21 issues worth fixing on mankenberg.com, 3 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: 1 image over 500 KB. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
88BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 72 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 72 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 72 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 74 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 77 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 92 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Mobile performance score: 84
84/100Your mobile performance score is 84 (desktop: 85). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Font display
450 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 13 KiBAbout 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
131 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (131 KiB).
Improve image delivery
45 KiB1 image could be 45 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.4 s
A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 82 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 54 ms
54 msYour server sent the HTML in 54 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.285
0.285The layout shifts by 0.285 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 28% slower for real visitors
+28%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 72 ms to 92 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
12 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 91 ms
91 msReal visitors wait 91 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 623 ms
623 msReal visitors wait 623 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 3.0 s
3.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.0 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sYour largest element renders in 2.1 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the image “Mankenberg self-acting control valves - surge relief valve …”.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Time to Interactive: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe page is fully interactive after 2.1 s.
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
h2_986x800startseite-min.gif weighs 15.5 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images in older formats
3 images (15.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (15.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit
0.29 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.29 g of CO₂e: 34.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 1.0 MB in 41 requests
1.0 MBYour homepage downloads 1.0 MB in 41 requests on a phone: images 753 KiB (22), fonts 131 KiB (3) and scripts 89 KiB (6). That is a lean page.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 17 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Your reliable partner in challenging times” and “Hydrogen – Energy source of the future”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (161 characters)
Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.mankenberg.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
94 internal links, 21 external
The homepage links to 94 pages on mankenberg.com and 21 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 35 characters
Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Mankenberg - home page - Mankenberg”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mankenberg.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.mankenberg.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,120 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.mankenberg.com/en/vacuum-control-valves/products has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page with very little text
https://www.mankenberg.com/zh has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 78 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 461 words of copy
The homepage carries about 461 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact form” and “Request callback”.
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Online shop”, “Request for flyers” and “Order Code structure”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mankenberg.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- gradwerk CMS 6 - www.gradwerk.de
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 21 issues on mankenberg.com, including 6 speed issues and 5 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.