Website review, no card needed
mankindag.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202638 issues · 82 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on mankindag.com, 14 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
69DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 6.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 6.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 94 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, infisecure.com and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 893 KiB and 537 ms of main-thread time.
Document request latency
550 ms · 68 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive about 550 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
560 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 560 ms on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 377 ms
377 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 377 ms of main-thread work and 661 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
400 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).
Reduce unused JavaScript
372 KiBAbout 372 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Server response: 660 ms
660 msYour server takes 660 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 145 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
15 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (15 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 540 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 7.1 s
7.1 sReal visitors wait 7.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 6.6 s
6.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 6.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors wait 3.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 10.1 s
10.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.446
0.446The layout shifts by 0.446 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 10.2 s
10.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 10.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sThe first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.12
0.12For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.5 s
3.5 sYour largest element takes 3.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Mankind Agritech Limited headquartered in New Delhi is an I…”. Most of its time is element render delay (5.1 s).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.7 s to 6.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 120 ms
120 msReal visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 168 ms
168 msScripts block the page for only 168 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.41 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.41 g of CO₂e: 49.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.5 MB in 90 requests
1.5 MBYour homepage downloads 1.5 MB in 90 requests on a phone: scripts 946 KiB (32), images 213 KiB (30) and fonts 108 KiB (5). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Unlabelled dropdowns
1 dropdown has no label.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
58 text elements with low contrast
58 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
25 tap targets too small
25 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h2 → h4 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts
Elements with role="none" or role="presentation" have conflicts (2 elements).
1 checks passed
15 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 21 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 15 passed and 6 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (183 characters)
Your meta description is 183 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://mankindag.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at mankindag.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
65 internal links, 31 external
The homepage links to 65 pages on mankindag.com and 31 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Crop Protection & Agriculture”.
Title: 56 characters
Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Agriculture Chemical Company in India | Mankind Agritech”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://mankindag.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://mankindag.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Other pages
15 pages share a title
https://mankindag.com/about-us, https://mankindag.com/policies-and-disclosures, https://mankindag.com/products, https://mankindag.com/product/herbicide, https://mankindag.com/product/insecticide and https://mankindag.com/product/fungicide and 9 others all use the title “Validation request”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
https://mankindag.com/about-us, https://mankindag.com/policies-and-disclosures, https://mankindag.com/products, https://mankindag.com/product/herbicide, https://mankindag.com/product/insecticide and https://mankindag.com/product/fungicide and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
https://mankindag.com/about-us, https://mankindag.com/policies-and-disclosures, https://mankindag.com/products, https://mankindag.com/product/herbicide, https://mankindag.com/product/insecticide and https://mankindag.com/product/fungicide and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 pages with very little text
https://mankindag.com/about-us, https://mankindag.com/policies-and-disclosures, https://mankindag.com/products, https://mankindag.com/product/herbicide, https://mankindag.com/product/insecticide and https://mankindag.com/product/fungicide and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 83 words
The homepage has only about 83 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mankindag.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Azure
Company
- Employees
- 380
- Headquarters
- New Delhi
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on mankindag.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.