Website review, no card needed

manukadr.es logo

manukadr.es website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202642 issues · 92 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on manukadr.es, 10 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.3 sMay 23Nov 72.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Oct 31, 20262.5 s
Nov 7, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
258 ms130 msMay 23Nov 7194 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026145 ms
May 30, 2026151 ms
Jun 6, 2026152 ms
Jun 13, 2026168 ms
Jun 20, 2026184 ms
Jun 27, 2026200 ms
Jul 4, 2026211 ms
Jul 11, 2026211 ms
Jul 18, 2026204 ms
Jul 25, 2026196 ms
Aug 1, 2026190 ms
Aug 8, 2026194 ms
Aug 15, 2026193 ms
Aug 22, 2026186 ms
Aug 29, 2026197 ms
Sep 5, 2026205 ms
Sep 12, 2026224 ms
Sep 19, 2026238 ms
Sep 26, 2026243 ms
Oct 3, 2026239 ms
Oct 10, 2026239 ms
Oct 17, 2026228 ms
Oct 24, 2026209 ms
Oct 31, 2026210 ms
Nov 7, 2026194 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of manukadr.es (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. manukadr.es at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. manukadr.es at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. manukadr.es at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. manukadr.es at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. manukadr.es at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. manukadr.es at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. manukadr.es at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. manukadr.es at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix69
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 69

    69/100

    Your mobile performance score is 69. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 308 KiB

    About 308 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Yotpo, Shopify and Klaviyo and others), adding 1.2 MB and 508 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 113 KiB

    About 113 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    382 KiB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (382 KiB).

  • Yotpo adds 252 ms

    252 ms

    Yotpo costs a phone 252 ms of main-thread work and 482 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Shopify adds 133 ms

    133 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 133 ms of main-thread work and 433 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 85 KiB

    4 images could be 85 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 90 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    14 KiB

    14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 29 ms

    29 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    Your largest element takes 6.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Productos de manuka naturales, probados y galardonados.”.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.7 s

    10.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 36% slower for real visitors

    +36%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 194 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 194 ms

    194 ms

    Real visitors wait 194 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 749 ms

    749 ms

    Real visitors wait 749 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 67 ms

    67 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 67 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.018

    0.018

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.018, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.0 MB in 368 requests

    3.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 368 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (131), other files 949 KiB (150) and images 526 KiB (52). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.86 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.86 g of CO₂e: 102.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8290
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 11 images without alt text

    11 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7784
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “Productos de manuka naturales, probados y galardo…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (166 characters)

    Your meta description is 166 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 9 links crawlers can't follow

    9 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 56 internal links, 19 external

    The homepage links to 56 pages on manukadr.es and 19 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 65 characters

    Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Manuka Doctor: Miel de Manuka auténtica online - Manuka Doctor ES”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.manukadr.es/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.manukadr.es/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (483 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.manukadr.es/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix65
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.manukadr.es/blogs/content/buy-with-confidence-as-trading-standards-approves-manuka-doctor, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.manukadr.es/collections/skincare, https://www.manukadr.es/collections/bienestar and https://www.manukadr.es/pages/rewards have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.manukadr.es/pages/rewards and https://www.manukadr.es/collections have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 23 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 6974
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://lantern.roeye.com/track.php?fingerprint=&referrer=&landingpage=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.manukadr.es%2F&useragent=Mozilla%2F5.0%20(iPhone%3B%20CPU%20iPhone%20OS%2017_5%20like%20Mac%20OS%20X)%20AppleWe.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected token ','”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    37 of 42 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 359 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 359 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 11 short forms

    11 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos and 4 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Hotjar.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and X (Twitter) Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 42 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 42 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at manukadr.es, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 7 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Consentmo Gdpr · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Triplewhale · Yotpo Loyalty Rewards · Yotpo Product Reviews · Gdpr Backpack · bogos.io

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Hotjar
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on manukadr.es, including 15 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25