Website review, no card needed
marapets.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202643 issues · 84 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on marapets.com, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 993 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 995 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 930 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 903 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 898 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 922 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 999 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 86 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 89 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 82 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 77 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 75 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 201 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
8.7 s · 5.3 MB53 images could be 5.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Mobile performance score: 48
48/100Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 72). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 432 KiBAbout 432 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 209 ms
209 msGoogle/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 209 ms of main-thread work and 426 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google/Doubleclick Ads, Google Tag Manager and Google FundingChoices and others), adding 766 KiB and 374 ms of main-thread time.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 100 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
44 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (44 KiB).
Minify JavaScript
16 KiB16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Reduce unused CSS
10 KiBAbout 10 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.6 s
A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 726 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 187 ms
187 msYour server sent the HTML in 187 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.2 s
14.2 sYour largest element takes 14.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.647
0.647The layout shifts by 0.647 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 14.2 s
14.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 14.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user INP: 221 ms
221 msReal visitors wait 221 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 122% slower for real visitors
+122%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 90 ms to 201 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 3.7 s
3.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.1 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 714 ms
714 msReal visitors wait 714 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 110 ms
110 msScripts block the page for only 110 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.1 MB in 147 requests
8.1 MBYour homepage downloads 8.1 MB in 147 requests on a phone: images 7.2 MB (97), scripts 746 KiB (19) and HTML 107 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
9 images far larger than shown
561 KiB9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example mill.png at 800 px wide, shown at 233 px. Resized copies would save about 561 KiB.
13 images in older formats
13 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
mill.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (344 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit
2.29 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.29 g of CO₂e: 274.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
3 dropdowns have no label.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
31 images without alt text
31 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (25 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 25 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
22 links without text
22 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
7 form fields without a label
7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (9 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
31 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (16 characters)
Your title is only 16 characters: “MaraPets - Games”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (64 characters)
Your meta description is only 64 characters: “Play our free HTML5 games on any device. No downloads necessary!”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://marapets.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
159 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 159 pages on marapets.com and 0 external pages.
1 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (485 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/ and /arcade.php all use the title “MaraPets - Games”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
5 pages share a meta description
/explore.php, /news.php, /calendar.php, /goal_games.php and /quest_games.php use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 pages without an H1
/marapets.php, /explore.php, /arcade.php, /forums.php, /dress_up_games.php and /clubs.php and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 107 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
23 small tap targets
23 of 81 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://www.marapets.com/maratalk/animate.min.css' from origin 'https://marapets.com' has …”.
12 low-resolution images
12 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 325 words of copy
The homepage carries about 325 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign Up”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Sign Up”, “Giftbox Shop” and “Shop Search”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at marapets.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on marapets.com, including 14 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.