Website review, no card needed
marshmallow.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202635 issues · 88 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on marshmallow.com, 14 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 184 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.5 s · 1.6 MB49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.6 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.0 s · 937 KiBAbout 937 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
2.6 s · 619 KiB4 images could be 619 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.8 s
A phone's processor spends 6.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Intercom and transcend-cdn.com and others), adding 1.8 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 819 ms
819 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 819 ms of main-thread work and 856 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 100 KiBAbout 100 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
500 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 356 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Intercom adds 328 ms
328 msIntercom costs a phone 328 ms of main-thread work and 237 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Document request latency
161 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Duplicated JavaScript
49 KiB49 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Legacy JavaScript
43 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 43 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
34 KiB34 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 30 ms
30 msYour server sent the HTML in 30 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.4 s
17.4 sYour largest element takes 17.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Default banner image”.
Time to Interactive: 26.3 s
26.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s
1.8 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 7.3 s
7.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sThe first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 155 ms to 184 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 119 ms
119 msReal visitors wait 119 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.8 s
0.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 355 ms
355 msReal visitors wait 355 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.3 MB in 151 requests
4.3 MBYour homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 151 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (68), images 1.0 MB (22) and fonts 432 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
small_674dcbe634f32dddb00554ad_24_221_Intro_to_Perks_Blog_He is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
2 images in older formats
2 images (274 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (26 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.21 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.21 g of CO₂e: 145.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (14 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 45 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
138 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 138 pages on marshmallow.com and 6 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 138 characters
Your meta description is 138 characters: “Get car, van and home insurance from Marshmallow. Fair prices, fast quotes, no jargon. Get a quote in minutes and see w…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Insurance priced on you”.
Title: 45 characters
Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “Affordable Car & Home Insurance | Marshmallow”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.marshmallow.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.marshmallow.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.marshmallow.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,676 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.marshmallow.com/help-category/claims and https://www.marshmallow.com/car-insurance-quote/start-quote have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.marshmallow.com/quote-landing and https://www.marshmallow.com/car-insurance-quote/start-quote have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=27030734&Ver=2&mid=8c4e6381-24a7-4948-9f27-686d30e15189&bo=1&sid=d2ff0db0d74e11f1aecf11e9632a8404&vid=d2ff0040d74e11f19d488b0415c15307&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.
2 small tap targets
2 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 615 words of copy
The homepage carries about 615 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get a quote” and “Get a free quote”.
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Get a quote”, “Get your quote” and “Contact us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 8 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads FullStory, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
29 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at marshmallow.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Hiring
- Hiring
- 13 open roles
- Teams
- Data (3), Car Finance (2), Design (2), Pricing (2)
- Job board
- ashby
- Careers page
- www.marshmallow.com/jobs (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on marshmallow.com, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.