Website review, no card needed

martiderm.com logo

martiderm.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202634 issues · 81 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on martiderm.com, 8 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s2.3 sMay 9Oct 242.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
248 ms147 msMay 9Oct 24229 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026159 ms
May 16, 2026165 ms
May 23, 2026168 ms
May 30, 2026164 ms
Jun 6, 2026166 ms
Jun 13, 2026173 ms
Jun 20, 2026180 ms
Jun 27, 2026194 ms
Jul 4, 2026203 ms
Jul 11, 2026202 ms
Jul 18, 2026204 ms
Jul 25, 2026203 ms
Aug 1, 2026205 ms
Aug 8, 2026221 ms
Aug 15, 2026226 ms
Aug 22, 2026235 ms
Aug 29, 2026236 ms
Sep 5, 2026226 ms
Sep 12, 2026222 ms
Sep 19, 2026220 ms
Sep 26, 2026228 ms
Oct 3, 2026229 ms
Oct 10, 2026233 ms
Oct 17, 2026233 ms
Oct 24, 2026229 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of martiderm.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. martiderm.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. martiderm.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. martiderm.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. martiderm.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. martiderm.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. martiderm.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. martiderm.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. martiderm.com at 3.1 s3.1 s

Speed

7 to fix67
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 67

    67/100

    Your mobile performance score is 67 (desktop: 59). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    540 ms · 103 KiB

    About 103 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 540 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    515 KiB

    About 515 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Font display

    350 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 278 ms

    278 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 278 ms of main-thread work and 340 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,704 HTML elements

    The page has 2,704 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Cookiebot and others), adding 730 KiB and 491 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    250 ms · 235 KiB

    41 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (235 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    250 ms · 203 KiB

    11 images could be 203 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 87 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 845 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 71 ms

    71 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 71 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.84

    0.84

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.84 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.975

    0.975

    The layout shifts by 0.975 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.6 s

    10.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors

    +43%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 159 ms to 229 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 20 images without width and height

    20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Your largest element takes 2.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Lorem ipsum”.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 177 ms

    177 ms

    Real visitors wait 177 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 109 ms

    109 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 109 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix90
  • 1 image far larger than shown

    6 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example campaña-ecovadis-martiderm-banner-home.jpg.webp at 600 px wide, shown at 195 px. Resized copies would save about 6 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (198 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (60 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.43 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.43 g of CO₂e: 51.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.5 MB in 70 requests

    1.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.5 MB in 70 requests on a phone: scripts 912 KiB (20), images 359 KiB (25) and stylesheets 108 KiB (3). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9494
  • 6 text elements with low contrast

    6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <marquee> elements are deprecated and must not be used (1 element)

    <marquee> elements are deprecated and must not be used: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 38 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7780
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Invalid hreflang

    Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 141 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 141 pages on martiderm.com and 9 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Welcome to MartiDerm”.

  • Title: 32 characters

    Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Welcome to MartiDerm | MartiDerm”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.martiderm.com/int-en.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.martiderm.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.martiderm.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (784 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/all-skin-types, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-types/dry-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/normal-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/combination-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/oily-skin and https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/needs/aging-and-wrinkles and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/all-skin-types, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-types/dry-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/normal-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/combination-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/oily-skin and https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/needs/aging-and-wrinkles and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 68 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://sibforms.com/forms/end-form/build/sib-styles.css' from origin 'https://www.martide…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 670 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 670 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “LEARN MORE”, “Contact” and “SUBSCRIBE!”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Taboola (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 23 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at martiderm.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Drupal
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Dinahosting

Company

Founded
1952
Headquarters
Cervelló

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on martiderm.com, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25