Website review, no card needed
martiderm.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202634 issues · 81 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on martiderm.com, 8 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 159 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 165 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 168 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 229 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.6 s
2.0 s
2.3 s
2.7 s
3.1 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 67
67/100Your mobile performance score is 67 (desktop: 59). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
540 ms · 103 KiBAbout 103 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 540 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
515 KiBAbout 515 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Font display
350 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).
Google Tag Manager adds 278 ms
278 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 278 ms of main-thread work and 340 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,704 HTML elements
The page has 2,704 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Cookiebot and others), adding 730 KiB and 491 ms of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
250 ms · 235 KiB41 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (235 KiB).
Improve image delivery
250 ms · 203 KiB11 images could be 203 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 87 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.6 s
A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 845 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 71 ms
71 msYour server sent the HTML in 71 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.84
0.84For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.84 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.975
0.975The layout shifts by 0.975 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 10.6 s
10.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 10.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors
+43%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 159 ms to 229 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.8 s
5.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
20 images without width and height
20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sYour largest element takes 2.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Lorem ipsum”.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 177 ms
177 msReal visitors wait 177 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 109 ms
109 msScripts block the page for only 109 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image far larger than shown
6 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example campaña-ecovadis-martiderm-banner-home.jpg.webp at 600 px wide, shown at 195 px. Resized copies would save about 6 KiB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (198 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (60 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.43 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.43 g of CO₂e: 51.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 1.5 MB in 70 requests
1.5 MBYour homepage downloads 1.5 MB in 70 requests on a phone: scripts 912 KiB (20), images 359 KiB (25) and stylesheets 108 KiB (3). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
<marquee> elements are deprecated and must not be used (1 element)
<marquee> elements are deprecated and must not be used: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 38 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Invalid hreflang
Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
141 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 141 pages on martiderm.com and 9 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Welcome to MartiDerm”.
Title: 32 characters
Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Welcome to MartiDerm | MartiDerm”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.martiderm.com/int-en.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.martiderm.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.martiderm.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (784 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 pages without a meta description
https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/all-skin-types, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-types/dry-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/normal-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/combination-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/oily-skin and https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/needs/aging-and-wrinkles and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/all-skin-types, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-types/dry-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/normal-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/combination-skin, https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/skin-type/oily-skin and https://www.martiderm.com/int-en/products/needs/aging-and-wrinkles and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 68 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 small tap targets
5 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://sibforms.com/forms/end-form/build/sib-styles.css' from origin 'https://www.martide…”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 670 words of copy
The homepage carries about 670 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “LEARN MORE”, “Contact” and “SUBSCRIBE!”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Taboola (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
23 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at martiderm.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Drupal
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Dinahosting
Company
- Founded
- 1952
- Headquarters
- Cervelló
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on martiderm.com, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.