Website review, no card needed

martifer.com logo

martifer.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202633 issues · 70 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on martifer.com, 10 of them high impact, across 70 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of martifer.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. martifer.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. martifer.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. martifer.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. martifer.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. martifer.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. martifer.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. martifer.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. martifer.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

3 to fix72
  • Improve image delivery

    1.3 s · 1.1 MB

    5 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 72

    72/100

    Your mobile performance score is 72. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Main-thread work: 2.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 240 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    81 KiB

    About 81 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    52 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 52 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Render-blocking requests

    50 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 50 ms.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1 KiB).

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 90 ms

    90 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 90 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix67
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    Your largest element takes 6.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We see each project as a new challenge and with our capacit…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.1 s

    9.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

3 checks passed
  • Total Blocking Time: 153 ms

    153 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 153 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.0 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 4.6 MB in 69 requests

    4.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.6 MB in 69 requests on a phone: media 2.6 MB (2), images 1.3 MB (12) and scripts 424 KiB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    imagem-porto.jpg weighs 806 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    932 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example imagem-porto.jpg at 1,776 px wide, shown at 293 px. Resized copies would save about 932 KiB.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.32 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.32 g of CO₂e: 157.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fix85
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 27 text elements with low contrast

    27 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • SVG elements with an img role do not have an accessible text alternative

    SVG elements with an img role do not have an accessible text alternative (1 element).

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 8572
  • Title is short (8 characters)

    Your title is only 8 characters: “Homepage”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Challenging limits every day” and “For over 36 years, Martifer has been developing s…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://martifer.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 57 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 57 pages on martifer.com and 4 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 127 characters

    Your meta description is 127 characters: “Encaramos cada projeto como um novo desafio e com a nossa capacidade de construção e inovação ultrapassamos todas as ba…”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://martifer.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (778 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://martifer.com/en/business-areas, https://martifer.com/en/projects, https://martifer.com/en/investors, https://martifer.com/en/media, https://martifer.com/en/industries/metallic-constructions and https://martifer.com/en/contacts and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 8 pages without an H1

    https://martifer.com/en/investors, https://martifer.com/en/media, https://martifer.com/en/projects/nrp-sines, https://martifer.com/en/projects/edp-headquarters, https://martifer.com/en/projects/abi-bakr and https://martifer.com/en/projects/world-explorer and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 9 pages with very little text

    https://martifer.com/en/projects, https://martifer.com/en/investors, https://martifer.com/en/media, https://martifer.com/en/media/downloads, https://martifer.com/en/projects/nrp-sines and https://martifer.com/en/projects/edp-headquarters and 3 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 31 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error with Permissions-Policy header: Parse of permissions policy failed because of errors reported by structured heade…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 747 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 747 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Learn More” and “Learn more”.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at martifer.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2020.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Employees
114,079
Founded
1990
Headquarters
Oliveira de Frades

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on martifer.com, including 7 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25