Website review, no card needed
martos.pt website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202650 issues · 89 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on martos.pt, 17 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 162 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.6 s · 871 KiBAbout 871 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.6 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
2.5 s · 691 KiB11 images could be 691 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 37
37/100Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 23). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.7 s
A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, kommo.com and Google CDN and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
900 ms · 221 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (221 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
600 ms10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 504 ms
504 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 504 ms of main-thread work and 337 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
kommo.com adds 477 ms
477 mskommo.com costs a phone 477 ms of main-thread work and 389 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 422 ms
422 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 422 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
450 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 58 KiBAbout 58 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 264 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 18 KiB18 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
26 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 21.9 s
21.9 sYour largest element takes 21.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Nova Loja Online Martos”.
Speed Index: 13.9 s
13.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 22.4 s
22.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s
4.2 sThe first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 650 ms
650 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 650 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.24
0.24For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.121
0.121The layout shifts by 0.121 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
12 images without width and height
12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 156 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Real-user INP: 174 ms
174 msReal visitors wait 174 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.6 MB in 184 requests
3.6 MBYour homepage downloads 3.6 MB in 184 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (66), images 1.1 MB (31) and other files 370 KiB (35). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
esquema-banner-600x176.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
7 images in older formats
7 images (584 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images far larger than shown
64 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Logos-embalagem-futuro.png at 867 px wide, shown at 281 px. Resized copies would save about 64 KiB.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (158 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.01 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.01 g of CO₂e: 120.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
7 text elements with low contrast
7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Positive tabindex
6 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
18 images without alt text
18 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
32 form fields without a label
32 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
60 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 60 pages on martos.pt and 9 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 144 characters
Your meta description is 144 characters: “Produzimos pellets certificados e paletes ajustadas às necessidades dos clientes. Economia circular e sustentabilidade …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Pellets”.
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Encomendar Pellets certificados? Visite website Martos®”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.martos.pt/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.martos.pt/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.martos.pt/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (428 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.martos.pt/carrinho is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
https://www.martos.pt/produtos and https://www.martos.pt/pellets-produtos all use the title “Pellets Martos? 100% Natural, Ecológico e Português”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.martos.pt/politica-de-privacidade, https://www.martos.pt/p2030-economia-circular-inov-sustentavel and https://www.martos.pt/termos-e-condicoes-de-venda have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.martos.pt/produtos and https://www.martos.pt/pellets-produtos use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.martos.pt/produtos, whose canonical is https://www.martos.pt/pellets-produtos. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
12 pages without an H1
https://www.martos.pt/carrinho, https://www.martos.pt/apresentacao, https://www.martos.pt/produtos, https://www.martos.pt/contactos, https://www.martos.pt/pellets-produtos-fr and https://www.martos.pt/pellets-produtos and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.martos.pt/produtos took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
19 small tap targets
19 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
A 8-field form
Your longest form asks for 8 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
Only about 189 words
The homepage has only about 189 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at martos.pt, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on martos.pt, including 25 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.