Website review, no card needed

martos.pt logo

martos.pt website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202650 issues · 89 checks

This review found 50 issues worth fixing on martos.pt, 17 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.4 sAug 1Oct 102.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
181 ms152 msAug 1Oct 10162 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Aug 1, 2026156 ms
Aug 8, 2026155 ms
Aug 15, 2026172 ms
Aug 22, 2026171 ms
Aug 29, 2026177 ms
Sep 5, 2026177 ms
Sep 12, 2026178 ms
Sep 19, 2026173 ms
Sep 26, 2026169 ms
Oct 3, 2026169 ms
Oct 10, 2026162 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of martos.pt (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. martos.pt at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. martos.pt at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. martos.pt at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. martos.pt at 4.5 s4.5 s
  5. martos.pt at 5.7 s5.7 s
  6. martos.pt at 6.8 s6.8 s
  7. martos.pt at 7.9 s7.9 s
  8. martos.pt at 9.1 s9.1 s

Speed

13 to fix37
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.6 s · 871 KiB

    About 871 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.5 s · 691 KiB

    11 images could be 691 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 23). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, kommo.com and Google CDN and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 221 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (221 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    600 ms

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 504 ms

    504 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 504 ms of main-thread work and 337 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • kommo.com adds 477 ms

    477 ms

    kommo.com costs a phone 477 ms of main-thread work and 389 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 422 ms

    422 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 422 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    450 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 450 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 58 KiB

    About 58 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 264 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 18 KiB

    18 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    26 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.9 s

    21.9 s

    Your largest element takes 21.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Nova Loja Online Martos”.

  • Speed Index: 13.9 s

    13.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.4 s

    22.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 650 ms

    650 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 650 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.24

    0.24

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.24 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.121

    0.121

    The layout shifts by 0.121 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 12 images without width and height

    12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 156 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 174 ms

    174 ms

    Real visitors wait 174 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix64
  • Page weight: 3.6 MB in 184 requests

    3.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.6 MB in 184 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (66), images 1.1 MB (31) and other files 370 KiB (35). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    esquema-banner-600x176.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (584 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    64 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Logos-embalagem-futuro.png at 867 px wide, shown at 281 px. Resized copies would save about 64 KiB.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (158 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.01 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.01 g of CO₂e: 120.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8490
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Positive tabindex

    6 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 18 images without alt text

    18 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 32 form fields without a label

    32 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 8598
  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 60 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 60 pages on martos.pt and 9 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 144 characters

    Your meta description is 144 characters: “Produzimos pellets certificados e paletes ajustadas às necessidades dos clientes. Economia circular e sustentabilidade …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Pellets”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Encomendar Pellets certificados? Visite website Martos®”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.martos.pt/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.martos.pt/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.martos.pt/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (428 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

6 to fix69
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.martos.pt/carrinho is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.martos.pt/produtos and https://www.martos.pt/pellets-produtos all use the title “Pellets Martos? 100% Natural, Ecológico e Português”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.martos.pt/politica-de-privacidade, https://www.martos.pt/p2030-economia-circular-inov-sustentavel and https://www.martos.pt/termos-e-condicoes-de-venda have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.martos.pt/produtos and https://www.martos.pt/pellets-produtos use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.martos.pt/produtos, whose canonical is https://www.martos.pt/pellets-produtos. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 12 pages without an H1

    https://www.martos.pt/carrinho, https://www.martos.pt/apresentacao, https://www.martos.pt/produtos, https://www.martos.pt/contactos, https://www.martos.pt/pellets-produtos-fr and https://www.martos.pt/pellets-produtos and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.martos.pt/produtos took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 6993
  • 19 small tap targets

    19 of 36 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix43
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 8-field form

    Your longest form asks for 8 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • Only about 189 words

    The homepage has only about 189 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at martos.pt, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 50 issues on martos.pt, including 25 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25