Website review, no card needed
marvel.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202648 issues · 97 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on marvel.com, 17 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 144 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.7 s · 4.5 MB134 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.5 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.5 s · 2.3 MBAbout 2.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.1 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 28
28/100Your mobile performance score is 28 (desktop: 55). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.2 s
A phone's processor spends 9.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, disney.com and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 5.3 MB and 3.2 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
800 ms · 1.0 MB29 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 868 ms
868 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 868 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
disney.com adds 696 ms
696 msdisney.com costs a phone 696 ms of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 586 ms
586 msGoogle/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 586 ms of main-thread work and 876 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 132 KiBAbout 132 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 361 ms
361 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 361 ms of main-thread work and 302 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 337 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
espn.com adds 261 ms
261 msespn.com costs a phone 261 ms of main-thread work and 269 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
40 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 55 but mobile only 28. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 15.2 s
15.2 sThe first text or image appears after 15.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 27.5 s
27.5 sYour largest element takes 27.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Time to Interactive: 46.4 s
46.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 46.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 15.2 s
15.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 15.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.0 s
2.0 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 147 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 170 ms
170 msReal visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 784 ms
784 msReal visitors wait 784 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.016
0.016The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.016, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.8 MB in 501 requests
10.8 MBYour homepage downloads 10.8 MB in 501 requests on a phone: scripts 5.4 MB (213), images 3.5 MB (118) and other files 1.1 MB (148). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
36 images below the first screen load straight away
36 images further down the page (1.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
9 images far larger than shown
429 KiB9 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20250331_newtomu_base_set_dsk.webp at 2,000 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 429 KiB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (394 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit
3.07 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.07 g of CO₂e: 367.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
14 text elements with low contrast
14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (28 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 28 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
12 links without text
12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 99 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (72 characters)
Your title is 72 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Marvel.com | The Official Site for Marvel Movies, Characters, Comics, TV”.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
93 internal links, 35 external
The homepage links to 93 pages on marvel.com and 35 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 133 characters
Your meta description is 133 characters: “Marvel.com is the official site of Marvel Entertainment! Browse official Marvel movies, characters, comics, TV shows, v…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “MARVEL AT NEW YORK COMIC CON”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.marvel.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.marvel.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.marvel.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,101 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.marvel.com/rss/feed has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.marvel.com/rss/feed has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.marvel.com/unlimited and https://www.marvel.com/culture-lifestyle/books use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.marvel.com/podcasts, whose canonical is https://www.marvel.com/digital-series/podcasts. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.marvel.com/rpg, https://www.marvel.com/shop/marvel-must-haves and https://www.marvel.com/rss/feed have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.marvel.com/unlimited has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 52 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 34 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Framing 'https://www.google.com/' violates the following report-only Content Security Policy directive: "frame-ancestor…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,021 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,021 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SCHEDULE”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Shop” and “Schedule”.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Comscore, Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
26 cookies set on arrival
26Opening the homepage sets 26 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
37 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at marvel.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on marvel.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.