Website review, no card needed

mashandgrape.com logo

mashandgrape.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202637 issues · 86 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on mashandgrape.com, 12 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.7 sMay 23Nov 71.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Oct 31, 20261.8 s
Nov 7, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
159 ms106 msMay 23Nov 7152 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026121 ms
May 30, 2026120 ms
Jun 6, 2026121 ms
Jun 13, 2026123 ms
Jun 20, 2026120 ms
Jun 27, 2026119 ms
Jul 4, 2026123 ms
Jul 11, 2026121 ms
Jul 18, 2026129 ms
Jul 25, 2026136 ms
Aug 1, 2026132 ms
Aug 8, 2026141 ms
Aug 15, 2026135 ms
Aug 22, 2026139 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026137 ms
Sep 19, 2026131 ms
Sep 26, 2026125 ms
Oct 3, 2026112 ms
Oct 10, 2026119 ms
Oct 17, 2026120 ms
Oct 24, 2026132 ms
Oct 31, 2026153 ms
Nov 7, 2026152 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mashandgrape.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mashandgrape.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. mashandgrape.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. mashandgrape.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. mashandgrape.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. mashandgrape.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  6. mashandgrape.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. mashandgrape.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. mashandgrape.com at 4.6 s4.6 s

Speed

10 to fix43
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    880 ms · 1.7 MB

    About 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 880 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Intercom and Klaviyo and others), adding 2.5 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 476 KiB

    35 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (476 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 657 ms

    657 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 657 ms of main-thread work and 762 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Intercom adds 312 ms

    312 ms

    Intercom costs a phone 312 ms of main-thread work and 471 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Klaviyo adds 196 ms

    196 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 196 ms of main-thread work and 619 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,622 HTML elements

    The page has 1,622 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 60 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 60 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 177 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    130 ms · 4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Improve image delivery

    13 KiB

    1 image could be 13 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify JavaScript

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    1 KiB

    1 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 11 ms

    11 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 35.3 s

    35.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Your largest element takes 5.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Calisco "Spirit of California" Craft Brandy”.

  • Speed Index: 7.2 s

    7.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 638 ms

    638 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 638 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 152 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.21

    0.21

    The layout shifts by 0.21 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 152 ms

    152 ms

    Real visitors wait 152 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.05

    0.05

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 716 ms

    716 ms

    Real visitors wait 716 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 6.8 MB in 762 requests

    6.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 762 requests on a phone: scripts 3.5 MB (203), other files 2.2 MB (419) and images 709 KiB (97). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Calisco_20Bottle_360x360.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (32 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.93 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.93 g of CO₂e: 231.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9595
  • 18 images without alt text

    18 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h6 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8384
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: sameAs is an empty list”.

  • 6 links crawlers can't follow

    6 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 139 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 139 pages on mashandgrape.com and 14 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 136 characters

    Your meta description is 136 characters: “THE GIFT OF GOOD TASTE,Exceptional spirits from across the globe, delivered every month. The perfect gift for someone w…”.

  • Title: 38 characters

    Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Craft Spirits Marketplace | Mash&Grape”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.mashandgrape.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mashandgrape.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.mashandgrape.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix69
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.mashandgrape.com/collections, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://www.mashandgrape.com/pages/wish-list, https://www.mashandgrape.com/collections/spirits and https://www.mashandgrape.com/collections/this-just-in use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.mashandgrape.com/pages/wish-list, https://www.mashandgrape.com/collections/spirits and https://www.mashandgrape.com/collections/this-just-in have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 83 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 3 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7376
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.mashandgrape.com/.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 63 words

    The homepage has only about 63 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Sign In / Sign Up”, “Sign Up” and “Shop”.

  • 37 short forms

    37 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and LinkedIn Insight and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 27 cookies set on arrival

    27

    Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies, 4 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 46 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 46 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mashandgrape.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 4 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · trafficmanager.net · intercom.io · rechargecdn.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2020.

Stack

Framework
Gatsby
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on mashandgrape.com, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25