Website review, no card needed
masvision.mx website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202641 issues · 88 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on masvision.mx, 14 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83B- #22,692 of 97,838 reviewed websitesbeats 72%
- #14,450 of 53,326 online storesbeats 66%
- #13,993 of 48,356 Shopify storesbeats 64%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 149 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 150 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 154 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 182 KiBAbout 182 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.0 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.0 s.
Main-thread work: 4.2 s
A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (productcustomizer.com, POWr and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 89). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
productcustomizer.com adds 581 ms
581 msproductcustomizer.com costs a phone 581 ms of main-thread work and 24 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
400 ms · 118 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (118 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 14 KiBAbout 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
POWr adds 275 ms
275 msPOWr costs a phone 275 ms of main-thread work and 13 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 214 ms
214 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 214 ms of main-thread work and 324 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 112 ms
112 msShopify costs a phone 112 ms of main-thread work and 852 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,528 HTML elements
The page has 1,528 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 151 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 89 but mobile only 56. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Minify JavaScript
9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Improve image delivery
6 KiB1 image could be 6 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 14 ms
14 msYour server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 13.1 s
13.1 sYour largest element takes 13.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 13.7 s
13.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s
4.5 sThe first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.5 s
7.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 149 ms to 154 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 135 ms
135 msReal visitors wait 135 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 751 ms
751 msReal visitors wait 751 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 196 ms
196 msScripts block the page for only 196 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.5 MB in 431 requests
3.5 MBYour homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 431 requests on a phone: other files 1.4 MB (246), scripts 1.1 MB (130) and images 763 KiB (23). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
50_OFT_6f9457af-e465-4c57-b86a-c567bf430feb_550x.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
2 images far larger than shown
294 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example X_RBMeta_LP_tile-2.jpg at 1,312 px wide, shown at 193 px. Resized copies would save about 294 KiB.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
0.98 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.98 g of CO₂e: 117.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
23 text elements with low contrast
23 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
9 images without alt text
9 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
182 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 182 pages on masvision.mx and 18 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Compra Lentes de Contacto, Solares y de Graduación con Grandes Promociones ✓Cupón de Bienvenida de $600 ✓Hasta 3 Meses …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Lentes Oftálmicos, de Sol y Lentes de Contacto para toda la familia”.
Title: 65 characters
Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “Venta Lentes Oftálmicos, de Sol y de Contacto — Más Visión México”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.masvision.mx/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Brand, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, Organization and Person.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.masvision.mx/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,261 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.masvision.mx/llms.txt (2 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.masvision.mx/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.masvision.mx/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.masvision.mx/customer_authentication/redirect, https://www.masvision.mx/collections/lentes-ray-ban-meta, https://www.masvision.mx/collections/probador-virtual-de-lentes-oftalmico and https://www.masvision.mx/collections/probador-virtual-de-lentes-solares have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
13 pages without an H1
https://www.masvision.mx/customer_authentication/redirect, https://www.masvision.mx/collections/mujeres-oftalmicos, https://www.masvision.mx/collections/hombres-oftalmicos, https://www.masvision.mx/collections/ninos-oftalmicos, https://www.masvision.mx/collections/lentes-ray-ban-meta and https://www.masvision.mx/collections/todos-oftalmicos and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 77 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Invalid or unexpected token”.
5 distorted images
5 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
42 of 42 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 217 words
The homepage has only about 217 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 3 email links.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
27 cookies set on arrival
27Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
42 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 42 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at masvision.mx, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on masvision.mx, including 17 speed issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.