Website review, no card needed

matter.in logo

matter.in website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202634 issues · 78 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on matter.in, 8 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.3 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.6 s
May 16, 20263.4 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.9 s
Jun 6, 20264.6 s
Jun 13, 20264.8 s
Jun 20, 20264.9 s
Jun 27, 20264.9 s
Jul 4, 20264.6 s
Jul 11, 20264.1 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20263.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.7 s
Aug 15, 20263.7 s
Aug 22, 20263.8 s
Aug 29, 20263.7 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
325 ms168 msMay 9Oct 24222 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026199 ms
May 16, 2026186 ms
May 23, 2026190 ms
May 30, 2026212 ms
Jun 6, 2026269 ms
Jun 13, 2026297 ms
Jun 20, 2026302 ms
Jun 27, 2026302 ms
Jul 4, 2026288 ms
Jul 11, 2026252 ms
Jul 18, 2026263 ms
Jul 25, 2026276 ms
Aug 1, 2026289 ms
Aug 8, 2026291 ms
Aug 15, 2026300 ms
Aug 22, 2026307 ms
Aug 29, 2026305 ms
Sep 5, 2026297 ms
Sep 12, 2026277 ms
Sep 19, 2026244 ms
Sep 26, 2026224 ms
Oct 3, 2026217 ms
Oct 10, 2026216 ms
Oct 17, 2026221 ms
Oct 24, 2026222 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of matter.in (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. matter.in at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. matter.in at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. matter.in at 3.8 s3.8 s
  4. matter.in at 5.0 s5.0 s
  5. matter.in at 6.3 s6.3 s
  6. matter.in at 7.6 s7.6 s
  7. matter.in at 8.8 s8.8 s
  8. matter.in at 10.1 s10.1 s

Speed

9 to fix52
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 739 KiB

    8 images could be 739 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 652 KiB

    About 652 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 864 ms

    864 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 864 ms of main-thread work and 1,012 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    362 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (362 KiB).

  • Facebook adds 209 ms

    209 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 209 ms of main-thread work and 309 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    250 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 191 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 19 KiB

    About 19 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    24 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 251 ms

    251 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 251 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.1 s

    23.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.0 s

    13.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Your largest element takes 6.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.14

    0.14

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.14 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 971 ms

    971 ms

    Real visitors wait 971 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 592 ms

    592 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 592 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 199 ms to 222 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 190 ms

    190 ms

    Real visitors wait 190 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 28% faster for real visitors

    -28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.013

    0.013

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.013, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix60
  • Page weight: 4.9 MB in 155 requests

    4.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.9 MB in 155 requests on a phone: scripts 2.0 MB (62), images 1.5 MB (26) and media 1.0 MB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Banner_Mobile (2).webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    345 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 3Mobile (2).webp at 1,572 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 345 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (96 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.39 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.39 g of CO₂e: 166.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

2 to fix94
  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9282
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (190 characters)

    Your meta description is 190 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 28 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 28 pages on matter.in and 6 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Polished performancePure precision”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “MATTER Electric Motorcycle: India's Best Electric Motorbike”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.matter.in/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.matter.in/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (332 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 8 pages share a title

    /, https://www.matter.in/booknow, https://www.matter.in/faq, https://www.matter.in/dealer-locator, https://www.matter.in/corporate-governance and https://www.matter.in/careers and 2 others all use the title “MATTER Electric Motorcycle: India's Best Electric Motorbike”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 7 pages share a meta description

    https://www.matter.in/booknow, https://www.matter.in/faq, https://www.matter.in/dealer-locator, https://www.matter.in/corporate-governance, https://www.matter.in/careers and https://www.matter.in/matter-care and 1 other use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    https://www.matter.in/booknow, https://www.matter.in/innovation-hub, https://www.matter.in/faq, https://www.matter.in/support, https://www.matter.in/dealer-locator and https://www.matter.in/partner-with-us and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.matter.in/ec-booking has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 14 internal pages checked

    We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 14 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 288 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 288 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book Test Ride” and “Book Now”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Book Now”, “Book Test Ride” and “Book Vehicle”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at matter.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on matter.in, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25