Website review, no card needed

maxm.com logo

maxm.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202628 issues · 77 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on maxm.com, 11 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 11.0 MB in 25 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.2 s887 msJun 27Oct 311.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.1 s
Jul 18, 20261.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.0 s
Aug 1, 20261.0 s
Aug 8, 2026961 ms
Aug 15, 2026928 ms
Aug 22, 2026927 ms
Aug 29, 2026981 ms
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 20261.2 s
Sep 26, 20261.2 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Oct 10, 20261.1 s
Oct 17, 20261.1 s
Oct 24, 20261.1 s
Oct 31, 20261.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
117 ms99 msJun 27Oct 31114 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 27, 2026106 ms
Jul 4, 2026104 ms
Jul 11, 2026105 ms
Jul 18, 2026104 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026103 ms
Aug 8, 2026102 ms
Aug 15, 2026101 ms
Aug 22, 2026102 ms
Aug 29, 2026105 ms
Sep 5, 2026110 ms
Sep 12, 2026113 ms
Sep 19, 2026114 ms
Sep 26, 2026115 ms
Oct 3, 2026113 ms
Oct 10, 2026113 ms
Oct 17, 2026113 ms
Oct 24, 2026112 ms
Oct 31, 2026114 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of maxm.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. maxm.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. maxm.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. maxm.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. maxm.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. maxm.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. maxm.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. maxm.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. maxm.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix88
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    450 ms · 7.4 MB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.4 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    2.7 MB

    7 images could be 2.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Mobile performance score: 88

    88/100

    Your mobile performance score is 88. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 2,364 HTML elements

    The page has 2,364 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 27 KiB

    About 27 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Cookiebot), adding 154 KiB and 108 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 70 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    14 KiB

    About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 167 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 228 ms

    228 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 228 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix100
  • Speed Index: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Your largest element takes 2.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide s…”. Most of its time is element render delay (1.9 s).

  • 19 images without width and height

    19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 114 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 119 ms

    119 ms

    Real visitors wait 119 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 400 ms

    400 ms

    Real visitors wait 400 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The page is fully interactive after 2.9 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 20 ms

    20 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 20 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 11.0 MB in 25 requests

    11.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.0 MB in 25 requests on a phone: media 5.9 MB (2), images 3.8 MB (10) and fonts 933 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 3.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    1.7 MB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example ska-rmavbild-2026-06-17-kl-115950.png at 1,126 px wide, shown at 296 px. Resized copies would save about 1.7 MB.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (3.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (3.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.11 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.11 g of CO₂e: 373.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8993
  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 20 links without text

    20 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10085
  • Title is long (84 characters)

    Your title is 84 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Max Matthiessen – Rådgivning inom pension, försäkring och sparande | Max Matthiessen”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://maxm.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 134 internal links, 21 external

    The homepage links to 134 pages on maxm.com and 21 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 132 characters

    Your meta description is 132 characters: “Vi hjälper företag och privatpersoner med pension, försäkring och sparande. Vi skapar trygghet och överblick samt långs…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Rådgivning som stärker både företag och medarbetare”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://maxm.com/se/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,813 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 61 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    12 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 878 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 878 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Matomo.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at maxm.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Matomo
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 28 issues on maxm.com, including 9 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25