Website review, no card needed

maxmilhas.com.br logo

maxmilhas.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202625 issues · 65 checks

This review found 25 issues worth fixing on maxmilhas.com.br, 8 of them high impact, across 65 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.2 s3.8 sMay 16Oct 315.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20265.8 s
May 23, 20265.6 s
May 30, 20265.5 s
Jun 6, 20265.5 s
Jun 13, 20265.2 s
Jun 20, 20264.6 s
Jun 27, 20264.2 s
Jul 4, 20264.1 s
Jul 11, 20264.4 s
Jul 18, 20265.1 s
Jul 25, 20265.3 s
Aug 1, 20265.3 s
Aug 8, 20265.2 s
Aug 15, 20264.9 s
Aug 22, 20264.8 s
Aug 29, 20264.7 s
Sep 5, 20264.6 s
Sep 12, 20264.7 s
Sep 19, 20264.7 s
Sep 26, 20264.6 s
Oct 3, 20264.7 s
Oct 10, 20264.9 s
Oct 17, 20265.1 s
Oct 24, 20265.6 s
Oct 31, 20265.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
1.0 s285 msMay 16Oct 31722 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026389 ms
May 23, 2026379 ms
May 30, 2026373 ms
Jun 6, 2026375 ms
Jun 13, 2026373 ms
Jun 20, 2026376 ms
Jun 27, 2026382 ms
Jul 4, 2026382 ms
Jul 11, 2026387 ms
Jul 18, 2026400 ms
Jul 25, 2026417 ms
Aug 1, 2026478 ms
Aug 8, 2026600 ms
Aug 15, 2026762 ms
Aug 22, 2026910 ms
Aug 29, 2026959 ms
Sep 5, 2026932 ms
Sep 12, 2026850 ms
Sep 19, 2026777 ms
Sep 26, 2026732 ms
Oct 3, 2026706 ms
Oct 10, 2026714 ms
Oct 17, 2026713 ms
Oct 24, 2026715 ms
Oct 31, 2026722 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of maxmilhas.com.br (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. maxmilhas.com.br at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. maxmilhas.com.br at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. maxmilhas.com.br at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. maxmilhas.com.br at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. maxmilhas.com.br at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. maxmilhas.com.br at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. maxmilhas.com.br at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. maxmilhas.com.br at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

1 to fix100
  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Blindado, icomoon.io and convisoappsec.com), adding 5 KiB and 6 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2 KiB).

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 100

    100/100

    Your mobile performance score is 100. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 25 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

4 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 897 ms

    897 ms

    Real visitors wait 897 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.16

    0.16

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.16 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 87% slower for real visitors

    +87%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 389 ms to 722 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.8 s to 5.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 546 ms

    546 ms

    Real visitors wait 546 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Your largest element renders in 0.9 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Não encontramos a página que você procura”.

  • Speed Index: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 1.0 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The page is fully interactive after 0.9 s.

Images and page weight

1 to fix90
  • 1 image far larger than shown

    81 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 672a71b0b6236sticker_maxradar_comecesuaviagem_v3.webp at 918 px wide, shown at 90 px. Resized copies would save about 81 KiB.

  • About 0.06 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.06 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.06 g of CO₂e: 6.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 205 KiB in 20 requests

    205 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 205 KiB in 20 requests on a phone: scripts 188 KiB (16), HTML 14 KiB (1) and stylesheets 3 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9595
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 56 form fields without a label

    56 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 3 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9274
  • Error status code

    The page answers with an error status, so search engines may drop it.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.maxmilhas.com.br/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at maxmilhas.com.br/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Only 1 internal link

    The homepage links to only 1 page on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “A Maxmilhas oferece as melhores opções de passagens aéreas, reservas de hotéis e venda de milhas em um só lugar. Econom…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Viva sua viagem ao máximo”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Passagens Aéreas, Hotéis e Venda de Milhas | Maxmilhas”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.maxmilhas.com.br/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Airline.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

1 to fix62
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    5%

    A phone browser shows 364 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 19. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.maxmilhas.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 8878
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=151021707&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=11054813-f8e0-4c04-90a6-a3180b2b11f1&bo=1&sid=41501eb0da3211f1844fa779e688fc74&vid=41502fb0da3211f1a61d6589176c43bc&vids=1&msclkid=N&gtm_.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 500 ()”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    19 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix20
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 364 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 364 words of visible text.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 29 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at maxmilhas.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
CloudFront

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 25 issues on maxmilhas.com.br, including 5 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25