Website review, no card needed

mazda.ca logo

mazda.ca website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202644 issues · 83 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on mazda.ca, 14 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.4 sMay 9Oct 242.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.0 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
182 ms149 msMay 9Oct 24178 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026153 ms
May 16, 2026154 ms
May 23, 2026155 ms
May 30, 2026159 ms
Jun 6, 2026162 ms
Jun 13, 2026162 ms
Jun 20, 2026163 ms
Jun 27, 2026164 ms
Jul 4, 2026164 ms
Jul 11, 2026165 ms
Jul 18, 2026165 ms
Jul 25, 2026164 ms
Aug 1, 2026163 ms
Aug 8, 2026163 ms
Aug 15, 2026163 ms
Aug 22, 2026164 ms
Aug 29, 2026164 ms
Sep 5, 2026166 ms
Sep 12, 2026168 ms
Sep 19, 2026167 ms
Sep 26, 2026169 ms
Oct 3, 2026170 ms
Oct 10, 2026171 ms
Oct 17, 2026175 ms
Oct 24, 2026178 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mazda.ca (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mazda.ca at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. mazda.ca at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. mazda.ca at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. mazda.ca at 2.0 s2.0 s
  5. mazda.ca at 2.5 s2.5 s
  6. mazda.ca at 3.0 s3.0 s
  7. mazda.ca at 3.5 s3.5 s
  8. mazda.ca at 4.0 s4.0 s

Speed

8 to fix48
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.6 s · 1.3 MB

    98 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 464 KiB

    About 464 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 50). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 336 KiB

    27 images could be 336 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 138 KiB

    About 138 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,308 HTML elements

    The page has 2,308 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, azure.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 589 KiB and 321 ms of main-thread time.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 204 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.0 s

    16.0 s

    Your largest element takes 16.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “LEASE FROM 0.99% 0% FOR 36 MONTHS‡​‡​ INCLUDES A 1.5% LOYAL…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.4 s

    16.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 881 ms

    881 ms

    Real visitors wait 881 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 62 images without width and height

    62 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 323 ms

    323 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 323 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.118

    0.118

    The layout shifts by 0.118 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 153 ms to 178 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 113 ms

    113 ms

    Real visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.09

    0.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 2.8 MB in 127 requests

    2.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 127 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (61), scripts 1.2 MB (23) and stylesheets 253 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    103 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 0_c23_3buildandprice_desktop.jpg at 1,600 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 103 KiB.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (300 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (213 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 96.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fix75
  • 11 images without alt text

    11 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 7 buttons without a name

    7 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5, h2 → h4 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 7576
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 15 links with vague text

    15 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 11 links crawlers can't follow

    11 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 143 internal links, 21 external

    The homepage links to 143 pages on mazda.ca and 21 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 145 characters

    Your meta description is 145 characters: “The official Canadian website for Mazda cars, crossovers, SUVs and EVs. Get vehicle specs, build & price, find a retail…”.

  • Title: 63 characters

    Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Mazda Canada: SUVs, EVs, Mid-Size Cars, Compacts and Crossovers”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mazda.ca/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.mazda.ca/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,771 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix68
  • 1 page without a title

    https://www.mazda.ca/link/f0d70ee0ddb44c9ea06e11744c929b6e.aspx has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.mazda.ca/en all use the title “Mazda Canada: SUVs, EVs, Mid-Size Cars, Compacts and Crossovers”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.mazda.ca/link/f0d70ee0ddb44c9ea06e11744c929b6e.aspx has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 12 pages without an H1

    https://www.mazda.ca/link/f0d70ee0ddb44c9ea06e11744c929b6e.aspx, https://www.mazda.ca/en, https://www.mazda.ca/fr, https://www.mazda.ca/en/vehicles/cx-5, https://www.mazda.ca/en/vehicles/cx-30 and https://www.mazda.ca/en/vehicles/cx-70-inline6turbo and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 73 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7785
  • 62 small tap targets

    62 of 82 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'querySelector') Object.animateFixed (https://www.mazda.ca/globalassets/static/…”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,482 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,482 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Request a Quote” and “CONTACT US”.

  • 16 calls to action

    The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Request a Quote” and “Request a Test Drive”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mazda.ca, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on mazda.ca, including 17 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25