Website review, no card needed
mazda.ca website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202644 issues · 83 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on mazda.ca, 14 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 178 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.6 s · 1.3 MB98 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.5 s · 464 KiBAbout 464 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 48
48/100Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 50). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Render-blocking requests
950 ms8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 336 KiB27 images could be 336 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 138 KiBAbout 138 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.7 s
A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,308 HTML elements
The page has 2,308 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, azure.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 589 KiB and 321 ms of main-thread time.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 204 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.0 s
16.0 sYour largest element takes 16.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “LEASE FROM 0.99% 0% FOR 36 MONTHS‡‡ INCLUDES A 1.5% LOYAL…”.
Time to Interactive: 16.4 s
16.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.9 s
8.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 881 ms
881 msReal visitors wait 881 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
62 images without width and height
62 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 323 ms
323 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 323 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.118
0.118The layout shifts by 0.118 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 153 ms to 178 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 113 ms
113 msReal visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.8 MB in 127 requests
2.8 MBYour homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 127 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (61), scripts 1.2 MB (23) and stylesheets 253 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
103 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 0_c23_3buildandprice_desktop.jpg at 1,600 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 103 KiB.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (300 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
3 images in older formats
3 images (213 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.81 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 96.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
11 images without alt text
11 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
7 buttons without a name
7 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Unlabelled dropdowns
1 dropdown has no label.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5, h2 → h4 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
15 links with vague text
15 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
11 links crawlers can't follow
11 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
143 internal links, 21 external
The homepage links to 143 pages on mazda.ca and 21 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 145 characters
Your meta description is 145 characters: “The official Canadian website for Mazda cars, crossovers, SUVs and EVs. Get vehicle specs, build & price, find a retail…”.
Title: 63 characters
Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Mazda Canada: SUVs, EVs, Mid-Size Cars, Compacts and Crossovers”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mazda.ca/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.mazda.ca/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,771 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.mazda.ca/link/f0d70ee0ddb44c9ea06e11744c929b6e.aspx has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.mazda.ca/en all use the title “Mazda Canada: SUVs, EVs, Mid-Size Cars, Compacts and Crossovers”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.mazda.ca/link/f0d70ee0ddb44c9ea06e11744c929b6e.aspx has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
12 pages without an H1
https://www.mazda.ca/link/f0d70ee0ddb44c9ea06e11744c929b6e.aspx, https://www.mazda.ca/en, https://www.mazda.ca/fr, https://www.mazda.ca/en/vehicles/cx-5, https://www.mazda.ca/en/vehicles/cx-30 and https://www.mazda.ca/en/vehicles/cx-70-inline6turbo and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 73 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
62 small tap targets
62 of 82 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'querySelector') Object.animateFixed (https://www.mazda.ca/globalassets/static/…”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,482 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,482 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Request a Quote” and “CONTACT US”.
16 calls to action
The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Request a Quote” and “Request a Test Drive”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mazda.ca, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on mazda.ca, including 17 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.