Website review, no card needed
mca.org.mt website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202634 issues · 84 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on mca.org.mt, 13 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 125 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 129 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 108 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 126 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
11.2 s · 6.2 MB12 images could be 6.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 11.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
7.7 s47 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 7.7 s.
Reduce unused CSS
3.5 s · 693 KiBAbout 693 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Clarity and others), adding 1.1 MB and 583 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
617 KiBAbout 617 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Font display
500 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).
Google CDN adds 360 ms
360 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 360 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.3 s
A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Minify JavaScript
178 KiB178 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 150 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
30 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Minify CSS
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
10 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 104 ms
104 msYour server sent the HTML in 104 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.7 s
19.7 sYour largest element takes 19.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “MCA 25 Years Stamp Set”.
Time to Interactive: 24.4 s
24.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.5 s
6.5 sThe first text or image appears after 6.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.5 s
7.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 246 ms
246 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 246 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 126 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 113 ms
113 msReal visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 704 ms
704 msReal visitors wait 704 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 42% faster for real visitors
-42%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.081
0.081The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.081, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.6 MB in 153 requests
9.6 MBYour homepage downloads 9.6 MB in 153 requests on a phone: images 6.5 MB (16), scripts 1.6 MB (70) and stylesheets 801 KiB (49). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 5.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
7 images far larger than shown
5.3 MB7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Website Banner(1).png at 5,175 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 5.3 MB.
7 images in older formats
7 images (6.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (243 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.7 g of CO₂ per visit
2.73 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.73 g of CO₂e: 327.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 14 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (29 characters)
Your meta description is only 29 characters: “Malta Communication Authority”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.mca.org.mt/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
58 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 58 pages on mca.org.mt and 4 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Home Page”.
Title: 30 characters
Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “Malta Communications Authority”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mca.org.mt/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (398 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
8 pages share a meta description
/consumer, /digital-services, /regulatory, /spectrum-technology, /publications and /consultations and 2 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 31 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “$(...).once is not a function Object.attach (https://www.mca.org.mt/modules/custom/mybills_payments/js/mybills.js?v=1.x…”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 331 words of copy
The homepage carries about 331 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Learn more”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mca.org.mt, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Drupal
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on mca.org.mt, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.