Website review, no card needed

mc.net.co logo

mc.net.co website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202629 issues · 75 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on mc.net.co, 6 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.5 sMay 9Oct 241.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.6 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
411 ms226 msMay 9Oct 24366 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026266 ms
May 16, 2026262 ms
May 23, 2026268 ms
May 30, 2026271 ms
Jun 6, 2026332 ms
Jun 13, 2026390 ms
Jun 20, 2026344 ms
Jun 27, 2026362 ms
Jul 4, 2026302 ms
Jul 11, 2026294 ms
Jul 18, 2026271 ms
Jul 25, 2026264 ms
Aug 1, 2026254 ms
Aug 8, 2026251 ms
Aug 15, 2026277 ms
Aug 22, 2026252 ms
Aug 29, 2026251 ms
Sep 5, 2026247 ms
Sep 12, 2026269 ms
Sep 19, 2026269 ms
Sep 26, 2026273 ms
Oct 3, 2026277 ms
Oct 10, 2026273 ms
Oct 17, 2026319 ms
Oct 24, 2026366 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mc.net.co (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mc.net.co at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. mc.net.co at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. mc.net.co at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. mc.net.co at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. mc.net.co at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. mc.net.co at 2.5 s2.5 s
  7. mc.net.co at 2.9 s2.9 s
  8. mc.net.co at 3.3 s3.3 s

Speed

2 to fix98
  • Improve image delivery

    342 KiB

    2 images could be 342 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 1,973 HTML elements

    The page has 1,973 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Render-blocking requests

    250 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 250 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 22 KiB

    About 22 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 98

    98/100

    Your mobile performance score is 98 (desktop: 95). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 20 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 153 ms

    153 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 153 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 460 ms

    460 ms

    Real visitors wait 460 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 30% slower for real visitors

    +30%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 266 ms to 366 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 820 ms

    820 ms

    Real visitors wait 820 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.9 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Diseñamos soluciones digitales que se adaptan a tus desafío…”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    The page is fully interactive after 1.9 s.

Images and page weight

1 to fix90
  • 1 image far larger than shown

    216 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example BANNERSAGRILAFT-scaled.jpeg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 370 px. Resized copies would save about 216 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (266 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (266 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.18 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.18 g of CO₂e: 21.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 645 KiB in 14 requests

    645 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 645 KiB in 14 requests on a phone: images 452 KiB (10), fonts 102 KiB (1) and HTML 56 KiB (1). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8789
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 6 tap targets too small

    6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 4 images without alt text

    4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 92100
  • 95 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 95 pages on mc.net.co and 18 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 156 characters

    Your meta description is 156 characters: “Recibe soluciones digitales con soporte humano 24/7: internet empresarial, servicios en la nube, cloud pública y tecnol…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Soluciones digitales diseñadas para crecer contigo”.

  • Title: 48 characters

    Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Media Commerce | Soluciones Digitales Escalables”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://mc.net.co/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://mc.net.co/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,376 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    /isps-2 and /enterprise-and-utilities all use the title “Soluciones tecnológicas para proveedores de internet | Media Commerce”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 9 pages without a meta description

    /trabaja-con-nosotros, /blog, /eventos, /interes-en-servicios, /test-de-velocidad and /conoce-nuestro-centro-de-operaciones-de-red-noc and 3 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /isps-2 and /enterprise-and-utilities use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 10 small tap targets

    10 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Stats is not defined”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • A 11-field form

    Your longest form asks for 11 fields (9 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 770 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 770 words of visible text.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mc.net.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Commerce Partners S.A

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on mc.net.co, including 8 speed issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25