Website review, no card needed
mccormick.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202642 issues · 88 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on mccormick.com, 15 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 25.3 MB in 442 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76C- #56,827 of 93,124 reviewed websitesbeats 34%
- #34,434 of 49,654 online storesbeats 26%
- #32,446 of 44,815 Shopify storesbeats 23%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 170 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 165 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 284 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 282 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.5 s
3.0 s
4.4 s
5.9 s
7.4 s
8.9 s
10.4 s
11.8 s
Speed
pearcommerce.com adds 1.9 s
1.9 spearcommerce.com costs a phone 1.9 s of main-thread work and 303 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 13.2 s
A phone's processor spends 13.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 8.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 41
41/100Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
6,482 HTML elements
The page has 6,482 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (pearcommerce.com, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 3.4 MB and 3.7 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.9 MB34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.9 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
340 ms · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 340 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
625 KiB23 images could be 625 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Google CDN adds 407 ms
407 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 407 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 392 ms
392 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 392 ms of main-thread work and 526 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
316 KiBAbout 316 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
minmaxify.com adds 292 ms
292 msminmaxify.com costs a phone 292 ms of main-thread work and 10 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 182 ms
182 msKlaviyo costs a phone 182 ms of main-thread work and 356 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 249 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
109 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 109 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
38 KiB38 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
15 KiB15 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 25 ms
25 msYour server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 43.0 s
43.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 43.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.5 s
14.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 835 ms
835 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 835 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s
4.4 sYour largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “McCormick Holiday campaign video starting with people in th…”.
Real-user INP: 314 ms
314 msReal visitors wait 314 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 68% slower for real visitors
+68%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 170 ms to 282 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.227
0.227The layout shifts by 0.227 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 497 ms
497 msReal visitors wait 497 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 25.3 MB in 442 requests
25.3 MBYour homepage downloads 25.3 MB in 442 requests on a phone: media 16.2 MB (2), images 4.0 MB (74) and scripts 3.4 MB (153). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
1_CPD_3-2-15.jpg weighs 644 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images in older formats
3 images (748 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 7.2 g of CO₂ per visit
7.16 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.16 g of CO₂e: 859.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 5 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (VideoObject and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
213 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 213 pages on mccormick.com and 0 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “McCormick spices and products have been kitchen must-haves since 1889. Learn about seasoning and cuisine while discover…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “MccormickMccormick”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Spices, Seasoning, Recipe Ideas & Cooking Tips | McCormick”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mccormick.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mccormick.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,703 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.mccormick.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 linked pages are broken
Your homepage links to https://www.mccormick.com/pages/mccormick-seasoning-mixes and https://www.mccormick.com/blogs/recipes, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.mccormick.com/pages/pumpkin-recipes is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
11 pages without an H1
https://www.mccormick.com/collections/mccormick, https://www.mccormick.com/pages/mccormick-herbs-spices, https://www.mccormick.com/pages/signature-seasonings, https://www.mccormick.com/collections/finishers-toppings, https://www.mccormick.com/collections/extracts-food-color and https://www.mccormick.com/pages/grilling and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 144 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“CSS appearance value `slider-vertical` is not standardized and will be removed.”).
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
75 of 88 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 31 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,006 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,006 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SIGN UP NOW”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “SHOP all McCormick products” and “Shop Collections”.
73 short forms
73 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
53 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 53 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mccormick.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Employees
- 4,825
- Headquarters
- Cockeysville
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on mccormick.com, including 24 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.