Website review, no card needed
mcobeauty.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202642 issues · 93 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on mcobeauty.com, 17 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78C- #45,974 of 91,264 reviewed websitesbeats 44%
- #28,210 of 48,147 online storesbeats 36%
- #26,780 of 43,352 Shopify storesbeats 33%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 197 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 178 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 161 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 162 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.0 s · 455 KiBAbout 455 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.3 s · 172 KiBAbout 172 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 181 KiB21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (181 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 36
36/100Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 48). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8,310 HTML elements
The page has 8,310 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 7.9 s
A phone's processor spends 7.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (gotolstoy.com, Klaviyo and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.1 MB and 987 ms of main-thread time.
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 547 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
gotolstoy.com adds 242 ms
242 msgotolstoy.com costs a phone 242 ms of main-thread work and 382 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 239 ms
239 msKlaviyo costs a phone 239 ms of main-thread work and 405 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 185 ms
185 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 185 ms of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 121 ms
121 msShopify costs a phone 121 ms of main-thread work and 497 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Bazaarvoice adds 91 ms
91 msBazaarvoice costs a phone 91 ms of main-thread work and 309 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 18 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Duplicated JavaScript
150 ms · 21 KiB21 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
95 KiB3 images could be 95 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 16 ms
16 msYour server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 22.7 s
22.7 sYour largest element takes 22.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Get 15% Off* Your First Order”.
Time to Interactive: 24.5 s
24.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.2 s
13.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s
4.4 sThe first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 918 ms
918 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 918 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 193 ms
193 msReal visitors wait 193 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.08
0.08For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 434 ms
434 msReal visitors wait 434 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 197 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.037
0.037The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.037, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.9 MB in 543 requests
4.9 MBYour homepage downloads 4.9 MB in 543 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (118), other files 1.1 MB (230) and images 968 KiB (165). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.39 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.39 g of CO₂e: 166.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
7 form fields without a label
7 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (5 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 85 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 6 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (169 characters)
Your meta description is 169 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 2 problems
Structured data found (Corporation) but with 2 problems, for example “Corporation: logo is not an absolute URL ("https:files/MCoBeauty.webp")”.
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
219 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 219 pages on mcobeauty.com and 5 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 53 characters
Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “MCoBeauty: Cosmetics & Beauty Products – MCoBeauty AU”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://mcobeauty.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://mcobeauty.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and description; sameAs (social profiles) and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,202 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages share a meta description
/collections/all, /collections/minis, /collections/the-holiday-collection and /apps/advanced-wishlist use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
14 pages without an H1
/collections/best-sellers, /collections/all, /collections/face, /collections/eyes, /collections/lips and /collections/skincare and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 86 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://mcobeauty.com/.
56 small tap targets
56 of 224 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 845 words of copy
The homepage carries about 845 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get 15% Off* Your First Order”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Shop” and “Contact Us”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
26 cookies set on arrival
26Opening the homepage sets 26 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
53 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 53 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mcobeauty.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on mcobeauty.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.