Website review, no card needed
mersaco.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202633 issues · 86 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on mersaco.com, 9 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 92 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 94 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.6 s.
Mobile performance score: 69
69/100Your mobile performance score is 69 (desktop: 97). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
560 ms · 430 KiBAbout 430 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 560 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
310 ms · 63 KiBAbout 63 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 201 ms
201 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 201 ms of main-thread work and 538 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and FontAwesome CDN and others), adding 955 KiB and 266 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
168 KiB6 images could be 168 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 100 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
24 KiB24 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
16 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16 KiB).
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 97 but mobile only 69. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.2 s
A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 477 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 16.5 s
16.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.7 s
5.7 sYour largest element takes 5.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Mersaco”.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.1 s
5.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 92 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.0 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 93 ms
93 msReal visitors wait 93 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 27 ms
27 msScripts block the page for only 27 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image over 500 KB
412-T4-Platinum-EIS_compressed.webp weighs 492 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
Page weight: 3.5 MB in 80 requests
3.5 MBYour homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 80 requests on a phone: images 2.3 MB (54), scripts 749 KiB (10) and fonts 361 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
AFrame-3_compressed.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
0.98 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.98 g of CO₂e: 117.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500% (1 element)
Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500%: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 48 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (81 characters)
Your title is 81 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Pharmaceutical Supplier - Leading Healthcare Distributor in Lebanon | Mersaco.com”.
Meta description is long (178 characters)
Your meta description is 178 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
27 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 27 pages on mersaco.com and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Leading healthcare distributor since 1959”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mersaco.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mersaco.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.mersaco.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (601 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://www.mersaco.com/home declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.mersaco.com/home all use the title “Pharmaceutical Supplier - Leading Healthcare Distributor in Lebanon |…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.mersaco.com/news-and-initiatives/65/diater-strengthens-allergy-education-through-nationwide-scientific-and-awareness-initiatives has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.mersaco.com/news-and-initiatives/66/live-lighter-novo-nordisk-brings-obesity-care-to-lebanon and https://www.mersaco.com/news-and-initiatives/64/mersaco-and-tabuk-pharmaceuticals-launch-lurabil-a-new-generation-atypical-antipsychotic use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
8 pages without an H1
https://www.mersaco.com/news-and-initiatives, https://www.mersaco.com/sciencehealth, https://www.mersaco.com/aboutus, https://www.mersaco.com/careers, https://www.mersaco.com/news-and-initiatives/66/live-lighter-novo-nordisk-brings-obesity-care-to-lebanon and https://www.mersaco.com/news-and-initiatives/64/mersaco-and-tabuk-pharmaceuticals-launch-lurabil-a-new-generation-atypical-antipsychotic and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.mersaco.com/sciencehealth has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.mersaco.com/home took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
14 small tap targets
14 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the image 'https://c.clarity.ms/c.gif' violates the following Content Security Policy directive: "img-src 'self…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 23 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 597 words of copy
The homepage carries about 597 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “GET IN TOUCH”, “Apply Now” and “Get in touch”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mersaco.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on mersaco.com, including 13 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.