Website review, no card needed

metalco.it logo

metalco.it website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202634 issues · 82 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on metalco.it, 10 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.3 s3.6 sMay 2Oct 174.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20265.1 s
May 9, 20264.9 s
May 16, 20264.8 s
May 23, 20264.6 s
May 30, 20264.8 s
Jun 6, 20264.8 s
Jun 13, 20264.7 s
Jun 20, 20264.5 s
Jun 27, 20264.2 s
Jul 4, 20264.1 s
Jul 11, 20264.1 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20264.0 s
Aug 1, 20264.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.9 s
Aug 15, 20264.0 s
Aug 22, 20264.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.9 s
Sep 19, 20263.9 s
Sep 26, 20264.1 s
Oct 3, 20264.1 s
Oct 10, 20264.1 s
Oct 17, 20264.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
166 ms97 msMay 2Oct 17105 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026158 ms
May 9, 2026153 ms
May 16, 2026134 ms
May 23, 2026114 ms
May 30, 2026117 ms
Jun 6, 2026115 ms
Jun 13, 2026115 ms
Jun 20, 2026111 ms
Jun 27, 2026110 ms
Jul 4, 2026108 ms
Jul 11, 2026110 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026111 ms
Aug 1, 2026113 ms
Aug 8, 2026111 ms
Aug 15, 2026112 ms
Aug 22, 2026111 ms
Aug 29, 2026109 ms
Sep 5, 2026105 ms
Sep 12, 2026106 ms
Sep 19, 2026105 ms
Sep 26, 2026105 ms
Oct 3, 2026107 ms
Oct 10, 2026105 ms
Oct 17, 2026105 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of metalco.it (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. metalco.it at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. metalco.it at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. metalco.it at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. metalco.it at 3.9 s3.9 s
  5. metalco.it at 4.9 s4.9 s
  6. metalco.it at 5.9 s5.9 s
  7. metalco.it at 6.8 s6.8 s
  8. metalco.it at 7.8 s7.8 s

Speed

8 to fix77
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, iubenda and cloudfront.net and others), adding 10.6 MB and 655 ms of main-thread time.

  • cloudfront.net adds 72 ms

    72 ms

    cloudfront.net costs a phone 72 ms of main-thread work and 10.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 77

    77/100

    Your mobile performance score is 77 (desktop: 66). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 280 KiB

    About 280 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 314 ms

    314 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 314 ms of main-thread work and 324 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 281 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • iubenda adds 269 ms

    269 ms

    iubenda costs a phone 269 ms of main-thread work and 125 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 120 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 120 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    242 KiB

    1 image could be 242 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 56 KiB

    About 56 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 14 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14 KiB).

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 717 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Your largest element takes 3.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “La collezione Animal Factory, disegnata da Luca Boscardin e…”. Most of its time is element render delay (4.0 s).

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 96 ms

    96 ms

    Real visitors wait 96 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 32% faster for real visitors

    -32%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 158 ms to 105 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.1 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 185 ms

    185 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 185 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 10.7 MB in 36 requests

    10.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.7 MB in 36 requests on a phone: media 9.6 MB (1), scripts 682 KiB (22) and images 286 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 3.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.04 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.04 g of CO₂e: 365.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8593
  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 18 links without text

    18 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Title is long (81 characters)

    Your title is 81 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Arredo Urbano: Panchine, Pensiline, Fioriere, Cestini Per Spazi Pubblici| Metalco”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 41 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 41 pages on metalco.it and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 126 characters

    Your meta description is 126 characters: “Metalco è un'azienda leader nella produzione di arredo urbano: panchine, cestini, box bici, pensiline, fioriere e molto…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “SocialDesignforRealLife”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.metalco.it/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.metalco.it/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.metalco.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (262 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.metalco.it/category/metalco is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.metalco.it/metalco/chiusura-aziendale-estiva, https://www.metalco.it/category/metalco and https://www.metalco.it/metalco/metalco-sostiene-la-prevenzione-del-tumore-al-seno-insieme-a-welfarecare have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.metalco.it/contatti has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.metalco.it/applicazioni has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://www.metalco.it/progetti, https://www.metalco.it/news and https://www.metalco.it/about/usiamo-materiali-riciclabili-che-durano-nel-tempo-e-rispettano-lambiente took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 18 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    26 of 31 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 374 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 374 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: iubenda

    A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at metalco.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on metalco.it, including 17 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25