Website review, no card needed

mgi-fr.com logo

mgi-fr.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202637 issues · 83 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on mgi-fr.com, 15 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s1.9 sApr 25Oct 102.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.7 s
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.6 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20263.2 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.4 s
Oct 3, 20263.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
129 ms76 msApr 25Oct 10112 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026105 ms
May 2, 2026106 ms
May 9, 2026101 ms
May 16, 202695 ms
May 23, 202696 ms
May 30, 202695 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 202687 ms
Jun 27, 202687 ms
Jul 4, 202682 ms
Jul 11, 202687 ms
Jul 18, 202689 ms
Jul 25, 2026106 ms
Aug 1, 2026105 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 202688 ms
Sep 12, 2026103 ms
Sep 19, 2026111 ms
Sep 26, 2026123 ms
Oct 3, 2026120 ms
Oct 10, 2026112 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mgi-fr.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mgi-fr.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. mgi-fr.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. mgi-fr.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. mgi-fr.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. mgi-fr.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. mgi-fr.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. mgi-fr.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. mgi-fr.com at 4.9 s4.9 s

Speed

10 to fix48
  • Improve image delivery

    10.3 s · 3.2 MB

    12 images could be 3.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.0 s

    21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.

  • amcharts.com adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    amcharts.com costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 380 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 53). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (amcharts.com, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 557 KiB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 253 KiB

    About 253 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    500 ms · 40 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (40 KiB).

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 497 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,330 HTML elements

    The page has 2,330 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 14 KiB

    About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    29 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 211 ms

    211 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 211 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.5 s

    19.5 s

    Your largest element takes 19.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.5 s

    19.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 719 ms

    719 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 719 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 105 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 104 ms

    104 ms

    Real visitors wait 104 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 5.5 MB in 66 requests

    5.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.5 MB in 66 requests on a phone: images 4.7 MB (24), scripts 674 KiB (19) and stylesheets 60 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (497 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.56 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.56 g of CO₂e: 187.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8992
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 11 links without text

    11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (3 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (2 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h4 → h6 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 26 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10091
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 143 internal links, 1 external

    The homepage links to 143 pages on mgi-fr.com and 1 external page.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 140 characters

    Your meta description is 140 characters: “MGI Digital Technology propose une gamme complète de solutions d’impression & ennoblissement numériques (dorure à chaud…”.

  • Title: 63 characters

    Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “MGI Digital Technology, impression et embellissement numériques”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://mgi-fr.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://mgi-fr.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://mgi-fr.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (760 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 10 pages without a meta description

    https://mgi-fr.com/marches, https://mgi-fr.com/marches/imprimes-commerciaux, https://mgi-fr.com/marches/packaging, https://mgi-fr.com/marches/web-to-print, https://mgi-fr.com/marches/imprimes-photo and https://mgi-fr.com/marches/etiquettes-adhesives and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 62 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 23 small tap targets

    23 of 44 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 284 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 284 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 1 cookie set on arrival

    1

    Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mgi-fr.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on mgi-fr.com, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25