Website review, no card needed

michaelsmithinc.com logo

michaelsmithinc.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202646 issues · 88 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on michaelsmithinc.com, 17 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.5 s450 msMay 2Oct 171.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 2026566 ms
May 9, 2026661 ms
May 16, 2026744 ms
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.2 s
Jun 27, 20261.2 s
Jul 4, 20261.1 s
Jul 11, 20261.0 s
Jul 18, 20261.0 s
Jul 25, 20261.1 s
Aug 1, 20261.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.1 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.2 s
Aug 29, 20261.1 s
Sep 5, 20261.1 s
Sep 12, 20261.1 s
Sep 19, 2026854 ms
Sep 26, 2026995 ms
Oct 3, 2026972 ms
Oct 10, 2026925 ms
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
84 ms41 msMay 2Oct 1768 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202662 ms
May 9, 202669 ms
May 16, 202670 ms
May 23, 202679 ms
May 30, 202676 ms
Jun 20, 202672 ms
Jul 25, 202664 ms
Aug 1, 202663 ms
Aug 8, 202664 ms
Aug 15, 202669 ms
Aug 22, 202664 ms
Aug 29, 202646 ms
Sep 12, 202654 ms
Sep 19, 202653 ms
Sep 26, 202662 ms
Oct 3, 202666 ms
Oct 10, 202662 ms
Oct 17, 202668 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of michaelsmithinc.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. michaelsmithinc.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. michaelsmithinc.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. michaelsmithinc.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. michaelsmithinc.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. michaelsmithinc.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. michaelsmithinc.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. michaelsmithinc.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  8. michaelsmithinc.com at 3.3 s3.3 s

Speed

11 to fix47
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.0 s · 7.5 MB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.5 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 311 KiB

    About 311 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 47

    47/100

    Your mobile performance score is 47 (desktop: 79). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    750 ms · 6.7 MB

    14 images could be 6.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and juicyorange.com and others), adding 8.5 MB and 173 ms of main-thread time.

  • Amazon Web Services adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Amazon Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 7.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    700 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 33 KiB

    About 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    400 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 400 ms).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 173 ms

    173 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 173 ms of main-thread work and 297 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • juicyorange.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    juicyorange.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 105 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 79 but mobile only 47. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 428 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.7 s

    13.7 s

    Your largest element takes 13.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.0 s

    16.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.7 s

    8.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.409

    0.409

    The layout shifts by 0.409 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 72% slower for real visitors

    +72%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.6 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 62 ms to 68 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 62 ms

    62 ms

    Real visitors wait 62 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 475 ms

    475 ms

    Real visitors wait 475 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 68 ms

    68 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 68 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 8.8 MB in 37 requests

    8.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.8 MB in 37 requests on a phone: images 8.2 MB (25), scripts 552 KiB (5) and stylesheets 43 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 3.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    1.7 MB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example header_image_2.jpg at 2,494 px wide, shown at 562 px. Resized copies would save about 1.7 MB.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (3.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.51 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.51 g of CO₂e: 300.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 6785
  • Images must have alternative text (2 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 18 text elements with low contrast

    18 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (11 elements)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 11 tap targets too small

    11 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8366
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (17 characters)

    Your title is only 17 characters: “Michael Smith Inc”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (316 characters)

    Your meta description is 316 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 41 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 41 pages on michaelsmithinc.com and 20 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (710 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/the-company all use the title “Michael Smith Inc”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 11 pages without a meta description

    https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/press-and-books, https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/interiors, https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/jasper-showroom/jasper-templeton, https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/jasper-showroom, https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/interiors/los-angeles-haven and https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/interiors/new-colonial-saltbox and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/the-company and https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/contact use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/press-and-books and https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/jasper-showroom have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/contact, https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/jasper-showroom/jasper-templeton and https://www.michaelsmithinc.com/jasper-showroom have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 11 small tap targets

    11 of 42 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 598 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 598 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Join the Waitlist” and “Sign Up”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at michaelsmithinc.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on michaelsmithinc.com, including 16 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25