Website review, no card needed

middleby.com.mx logo

middleby.com.mx website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202642 issues · 86 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on middleby.com.mx, 13 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s1.3 sMay 2Oct 171.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.6 s
May 9, 20261.5 s
May 16, 20261.5 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.6 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
156 ms97 msMay 9Jul 25135 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026104 ms
Jul 4, 2026139 ms
Jul 11, 2026149 ms
Jul 25, 2026135 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of middleby.com.mx (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. middleby.com.mx at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. middleby.com.mx at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. middleby.com.mx at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. middleby.com.mx at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. middleby.com.mx at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. middleby.com.mx at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. middleby.com.mx at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. middleby.com.mx at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix55
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.8 s · 723 KiB

    About 723 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 947 KiB

    24 images could be 947 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.5 s · 407 KiB

    91 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (407 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 90). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 1.8 MB and 634 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 150 KiB

    About 150 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 306 ms

    306 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 306 ms of main-thread work and 959 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 160 ms

    160 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 160 ms of main-thread work and 318 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 132 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 90 but mobile only 55. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 923 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.6 s

    17.6 s

    Your largest element takes 17.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “...”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.9 s

    17.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.8 s

    8.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 105 images without width and height

    105 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 104 ms to 135 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 134 ms

    134 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 134 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • Page weight: 3.5 MB in 130 requests

    3.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 130 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (79), scripts 1.5 MB (23) and fonts 163 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 15 images in older formats

    15 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    177 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example mostrador_midd.jpg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 177 KiB.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (410 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.99 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.99 g of CO₂e: 118.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7991
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 106 images without alt text

    106 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 110 links without text

    110 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h1 → h4 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

8 to fixGoogle 7562
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (17 characters)

    Your title is only 17 characters: “Middleby | México”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 17 H1 headlines

    There are 17 <h1> headlines (“SOLUCIONES INTELIGENTES A LA MEDIDA DE TU COCINA”, “INNOVACIÓN EN EQUIPOS PARA FOOD SERVICE” and “¿TUS EQUIPOS ESTÁN OPERANDO COMO DEBERÍAN?”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://middleby.com.mx/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 35 internal links, 151 external

    The homepage links to 35 pages on middleby.com.mx and 151 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://middleby.com.mx/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (755 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 11 pages share a title

    /, https://middleby.com.mx/Middleby, https://middleby.com.mx/comercial, https://middleby.com.mx/residencial, https://middleby.com.mx/processing and https://middleby.com.mx/advantage and 5 others all use the title “Middleby | México”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 10 pages without a meta description

    https://middleby.com.mx/Middleby, https://middleby.com.mx/comercial, https://middleby.com.mx/residencial, https://middleby.com.mx/processing, https://middleby.com.mx/advantage and https://middleby.com.mx/design and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://middleby.com.mx/marcas and https://middleby.com.mx/aviso-de-privacidad have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://middleby.com.mx/marcas has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 10 internal pages checked

    We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7394
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    112 of 113 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 104 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 695 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 695 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and HubSpot.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at middleby.com.mx, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on middleby.com.mx, including 14 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25