Website review, no card needed

midmark.com logo

midmark.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202637 issues · 83 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on midmark.com, 11 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.7 s1.5 sMay 16Oct 312.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.4 s
May 23, 20264.1 s
May 30, 20264.1 s
Jun 6, 20264.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Oct 31, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
141 ms98 msMay 16Oct 31108 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026130 ms
May 23, 2026128 ms
May 30, 2026130 ms
Jun 6, 2026136 ms
Jun 13, 2026132 ms
Jun 20, 2026127 ms
Jun 27, 2026124 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026121 ms
Jul 18, 2026130 ms
Jul 25, 2026125 ms
Aug 1, 2026122 ms
Aug 8, 2026116 ms
Aug 15, 2026105 ms
Aug 22, 2026105 ms
Aug 29, 2026108 ms
Sep 5, 2026116 ms
Sep 12, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026136 ms
Sep 26, 2026134 ms
Oct 3, 2026123 ms
Oct 10, 2026111 ms
Oct 17, 2026104 ms
Oct 24, 2026103 ms
Oct 31, 2026108 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of midmark.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. midmark.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. midmark.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. midmark.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. midmark.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  5. midmark.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  6. midmark.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  7. midmark.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  8. midmark.com at 5.9 s5.9 s

Speed

14 to fix51
  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Main-thread work: 4.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, imi.chat and Hotjar and others), adding 3.4 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    290 ms · 764 KiB

    About 764 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 290 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 370 KiB

    About 370 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    350 ms · 406 KiB

    27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (406 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 92 KiB

    3 images could be 92 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • imi.chat adds 351 ms

    351 ms

    imi.chat costs a phone 351 ms of main-thread work and 812 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Hotjar adds 343 ms

    343 ms

    Hotjar costs a phone 343 ms of main-thread work and 272 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 361 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 264 ms

    264 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 264 ms of main-thread work and 258 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Usercentrics CMP adds 55 ms

    55 ms

    Usercentrics CMP costs a phone 55 ms of main-thread work and 902 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    67 KiB

    67 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    56 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 56 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    24 KiB

    24 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 26.2 s

    26.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 26.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    Your largest element takes 6.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

10 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 94 ms

    94 ms

    Real visitors wait 94 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 684 ms

    684 ms

    Real visitors wait 684 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 108 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 53% faster for real visitors

    -53%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.4 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.4 MB in 183 requests

    4.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 183 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (53), other files 960 KiB (81) and images 759 KiB (23). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (33 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.26 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.26 g of CO₂e: 151.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9796
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 6 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10089
  • Title is long (69 characters)

    Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Midmark Medical, Dental, Veterinary Equipment Manufacturer & Supplier”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 289 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 289 pages on midmark.com and 4 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “Midmark is a global manufacturer and supplier of healthcare products, equipment and diagnostic software for medical, ve…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Space designed for a purpose.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.midmark.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.midmark.com/sitemap/sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.midmark.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

4 to fix70
  • 2 pages without a title

    https://www.midmark.com/nav/contact-us/online-store and https://www.midmark.com/nav/contact-us/product-manuals have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.midmark.com/nav/contact-us/online-store and https://www.midmark.com/nav/contact-us/product-manuals have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 8 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 8 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.midmark.com/nav/solutions/medical-solutions, whose canonical is https://www.midmark.com/medical/medical-solutions. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.midmark.com/nav/contact-us/online-store and https://www.midmark.com/nav/contact-us/product-manuals have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 21 small tap targets

    21 of 27 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the image 'https://ade.googlesyndication.com/ddm/activity/src=14972386;type=invmedia;cat=midma0;rcb=3;ord=73108…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 69 words

    The homepage has only about 69 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 17 calls to action

    The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Contact Our Sales Team” and “Request Product Samples”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 26 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at midmark.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Company

Employees
1,812
Founded
1915
Headquarters
Dayton

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on midmark.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25