Website review, no card needed
midnighthour.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202643 issues · 85 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on midnighthour.com, 17 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 41. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68D- #94,790 of 107,564 reviewed websitesbeats 10%
- #56,729 of 60,845 online storesbeats 5%
- #52,361 of 55,515 Shopify storesbeats 5%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 190 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.2 s
3.3 s
4.4 s
5.6 s
6.7 s
7.8 s
8.9 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 41
41/100Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.4 s
A phone's processor spends 9.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
7,437 HTML elements
The page has 7,437 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
3.6 MB63 images could be 3.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.8 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Klaviyo, rebuyengine.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.9 MB and 967 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 473 KiBAbout 473 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
600 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.
Klaviyo adds 312 ms
312 msKlaviyo costs a phone 312 ms of main-thread work and 553 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
rebuyengine.com adds 168 ms
168 msrebuyengine.com costs a phone 168 ms of main-thread work and 716 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 80 KiBAbout 80 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
201 KiB22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (201 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
98 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 98 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 15 ms
15 msYour server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user INP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 17.7 s
17.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s
1.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 7.5 s
7.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.0 s
5.0 sYour largest element takes 5.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “A woman wearing black sunglasses and a black jacket sits in…”.
Real-user CLS: 0.17
0.17For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 39% slower for real visitors
+39%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 134 ms to 190 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.15
0.15The layout shifts by 0.15 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 646 ms
646 msReal visitors wait 646 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.1 MB in 482 requests
8.1 MBYour homepage downloads 8.1 MB in 482 requests on a phone: images 4.6 MB (88), scripts 1.8 MB (144) and other files 1.1 MB (208). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Walk_of_Shadows_-_Mobile.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit
2.31 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.31 g of CO₂e: 277.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Summary elements must have discernible text (2 elements)
Summary elements must have discernible text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
92 buttons without a name
92 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 696 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (75 characters)
Your title is 75 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Shop Goth Clothing & Alt Aesthetic Outfits at Midnight Hour – Midnight Hour”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
235 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 235 pages on midnighthour.com and 4 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 160 characters
Your meta description is 160 characters: “Shop Midnight Hour for goth clothing & dark aesthetic apparel! Everyday alt fashion for every body, from statement piec…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.midnighthour.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.midnighthour.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (713 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.midnighthour.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.midnighthour.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.midnighthour.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.midnighthour.com/collections/women-s-all, https://www.midnighthour.com/collections/sale and https://www.midnighthour.com/customer_authentication/redirect have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages without an H1
https://www.midnighthour.com/collections/edward-gorey, https://www.midnighthour.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://www.midnighthour.com/collections/witchy-clothing, https://www.midnighthour.com/collections/whimsigoth-clothing and https://www.midnighthour.com/collections/corporate-goth have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 134 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
76 of 81 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 895 words of copy
The homepage carries about 895 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Shop All” and “Contact Us”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
20 cookies set on arrival
20Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
50 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 50 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at midnighthour.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on midnighthour.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.