Website review, no card needed

midwich.com logo

midwich.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202633 issues · 85 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on midwich.com, 14 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s2.3 sMay 9Oct 242.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.6 s
Jul 18, 20263.4 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.8 s
Oct 24, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
110 ms75 msMay 9Oct 2479 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202693 ms
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 202693 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026106 ms
Jun 13, 2026104 ms
Jun 20, 2026105 ms
Jun 27, 2026102 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202694 ms
Jul 18, 202692 ms
Jul 25, 202690 ms
Aug 1, 202688 ms
Aug 8, 202699 ms
Aug 15, 202699 ms
Aug 22, 2026104 ms
Aug 29, 2026102 ms
Sep 5, 202688 ms
Sep 12, 202688 ms
Sep 19, 202686 ms
Sep 26, 202688 ms
Oct 3, 202686 ms
Oct 10, 202679 ms
Oct 17, 202680 ms
Oct 24, 202679 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of midwich.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. midwich.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. midwich.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. midwich.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. midwich.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  5. midwich.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  6. midwich.com at 6.8 s6.8 s
  7. midwich.com at 7.9 s7.9 s
  8. midwich.com at 9.1 s9.1 s

Speed

4 to fix49
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    350 ms · 314 KiB

    5 images could be 314 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    350 ms · 55 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (55 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    About 24 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, freeprivacypolicy.com and Google Fonts), adding 152 KiB and 68 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 103 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 107 ms

    107 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 107 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.968

    0.968

    The layout shifts by 0.968 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 12.7 s

    12.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Your largest element takes 4.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “tile 1 bg”. Most of its time is resource load delay (5.8 s).

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 81 images without width and height

    81 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 79 ms

    79 ms

    Real visitors wait 79 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 79 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (125 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (141 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.37 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.37 g of CO₂e: 43.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.3 MB in 102 requests

    1.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 102 requests on a phone: images 1.1 MB (90), scripts 135 KiB (4) and fonts 60 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7987
  • Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (8 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 70 text elements with low contrast

    70 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (71 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 71 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 88 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8376
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • 65 links with vague text

    65 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (161 characters)

    Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 66 internal links, 220 external

    The homepage links to 66 pages on midwich.com and 220 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Midwich | Specialist AV & Technology Distributor UK Copy”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.midwich.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.midwich.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,143 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.midwich.com/sustainabilityUKI, whose canonical is https://www.midwich.com/campaign/sustainabilityuki. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.midwich.com/campaign/connected has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.midwich.com/campaign/ukidirectory has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 9 pages slow to respond

    https://www.midwich.com/about-us/our-history, https://www.midwich.com/sustainabilityUKI, https://www.midwich.com/services/credit-services, https://www.midwich.com/services/it-services, https://www.midwich.com/expertise/marketing-hub and https://www.midwich.com/news-and-events/blogs and 3 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    26 of 27 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix88
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,066 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,066 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “REGISTER FOR A TRADE ACCOUNT” and “GET IN TOUCH”.

  • 69 calls to action

    The homepage has 69 calls to action, for example “Register for a trade account”, “Get in Touch” and “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at midwich.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
SilverStripe - http://silverstripe.org
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on midwich.com, including 14 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25