Website review, no card needed
miele.com.au website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202630 issues · 85 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on miele.com.au, 8 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 12.7 MB in 151 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 155 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 154 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 142 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.5 s
2.2 s
3.0 s
3.7 s
4.4 s
5.2 s
5.9 s
Speed
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (mypurecloud.de, Google Tag Manager and Optanon and others), adding 11.7 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
mypurecloud.de adds 990 ms
990 msmypurecloud.de costs a phone 990 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
contentstack.com adds 0 ms
0 mscontentstack.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 9.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
650 ms · 351 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (351 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 50
50/100Your mobile performance score is 50 (desktop: 77). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
600 ms14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 471 ms
471 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 471 ms of main-thread work and 326 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.8 s
A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
293 KiB6 images could be 293 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 225 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
87 KiB87 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
20 KiBAbout 20 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 77 but mobile only 50. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 77 ms
77 msYour server sent the HTML in 77 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 22.7 s
22.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.5 s
6.5 sYour largest element takes 6.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “A new species is here. The Miele Outdoor Kitchen.”.
First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 699 ms
699 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 699 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 4.4 s
4.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 142 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 149 ms
149 msReal visitors wait 149 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 654 ms
654 msReal visitors wait 654 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.015
0.015The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.015, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.7 MB in 151 requests
12.7 MBYour homepage downloads 12.7 MB in 151 requests on a phone: media 8.6 MB (2), scripts 2.1 MB (59) and images 1.3 MB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (65 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (112 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.6 g of CO₂ per visit
3.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.59 g of CO₂e: 430.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
5 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 35 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
36 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“A new species is here. The Miele Outdoor Kitchen.” and “Appliance Demonstrations and Events”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
237 internal links, 110 external
The homepage links to 237 pages on miele.com.au and 110 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 156 characters
Your meta description is 156 characters: “Explore Miele Australia's homepage for Immer Besser (Always Better) appliances. Discover premium washing machines, oven…”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Miele Australia Homepage - Discover Immer Besser Appliances”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.miele.com.au/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.miele.com.au/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.miele.com.au/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,506 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.miele.com.au/experiences/demonstrations, https://www.miele.com.au/experiences/personalised-consultation and https://www.miele.com.au/experiences/promotions have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.miele.com.au/experiences/events, https://www.miele.com.au/experiences/promotions and https://www.miele.com.au/experiences/recipes have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.miele.com.au/experiences/mieleforlife, https://www.miele.com.au/experiences/demonstrations and https://www.miele.com.au/experiences/events took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
201 of 221 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,141 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,141 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book a Demonstration” and “Book an Event”.
70 calls to action
The homepage has 70 calls to action, for example “Book a Demonstration”, “Book an Event” and “Online shop”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at miele.com.au, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Nuxt
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Fly.io
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on miele.com.au, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.