Website review, no card needed

migplus.com.br logo

migplus.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202639 issues · 88 checks

This review found 39 issues worth fixing on migplus.com.br, 14 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s2.1 sMay 2Oct 172.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.3 s
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.2 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
140 ms99 msMay 2Oct 17123 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026114 ms
May 9, 2026113 ms
May 16, 2026110 ms
May 23, 2026113 ms
May 30, 2026115 ms
Jun 6, 2026122 ms
Jun 13, 2026127 ms
Jun 20, 2026130 ms
Jun 27, 2026131 ms
Jul 4, 2026126 ms
Jul 11, 2026123 ms
Jul 18, 2026124 ms
Jul 25, 2026129 ms
Aug 1, 2026132 ms
Aug 8, 2026135 ms
Aug 15, 2026122 ms
Aug 22, 2026114 ms
Aug 29, 2026107 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026107 ms
Sep 19, 2026110 ms
Sep 26, 2026118 ms
Oct 3, 2026115 ms
Oct 10, 2026119 ms
Oct 17, 2026123 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of migplus.com.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. migplus.com.br at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. migplus.com.br at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. migplus.com.br at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. migplus.com.br at 2.9 s2.9 s
  5. migplus.com.br at 3.7 s3.7 s
  6. migplus.com.br at 4.4 s4.4 s
  7. migplus.com.br at 5.1 s5.1 s
  8. migplus.com.br at 5.9 s5.9 s

Speed

6 to fix60
  • Improve image delivery

    3.5 s · 857 KiB

    9 images could be 857 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 93). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    760 ms · 219 KiB

    About 219 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 760 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 252 ms

    252 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 252 ms of main-thread work and 305 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 683 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Unpkg and others), adding 542 KiB and 369 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 212 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 33 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    About 24 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    14 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14 KiB).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 93 but mobile only 60. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 295 ms

    295 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 295 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.6 s

    15.6 s

    Your largest element takes 15.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “EXCELÊNCIA EM NUTRIÇÃO ANIMAL”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.9 s

    15.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 114 ms to 123 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 140 ms

    140 ms

    Real visitors wait 140 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 187 ms

    187 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 187 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 16.4 MB in 107 requests

    16.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 16.4 MB in 107 requests on a phone: media 12.9 MB (2), images 2.4 MB (37) and scripts 762 KiB (38). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    579 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example caminhamigcerto-copiar.webp at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 579 KiB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (965 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (103 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.64 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.64 g of CO₂e: 556.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 42 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • Title is short (26 characters)

    Your title is only 26 characters: “Nutrição Animal - Mig-PLUS”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 68 internal links, 40 external

    The homepage links to 68 pages on migplus.com.br and 40 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 131 characters

    Your meta description is 131 characters: “Produtos para nutrição animal Mig-PLUS. Nutrição para suínos, bovinos, equinos, ovinos e aves. Excelência em Nutrição p…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “EXCELÊNCIA EM NUTRIÇÃO ANIMAL”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.migplus.com.br/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, Organization, Person and VideoObject.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.migplus.com.br/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,131 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.migplus.com.br/llms.txt (47 KiB, 182 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.migplus.com.br/categoria/equinos and https://www.migplus.com.br/categoria/caes are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://www.migplus.com.br/representantes, https://www.migplus.com.br/blog-mig-plus, https://www.migplus.com.br/categoria/suinos, https://www.migplus.com.br/bovinos, https://www.migplus.com.br/categoria/ovinos and https://www.migplus.com.br/categoria/equinos and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://www.migplus.com.br/social, https://www.migplus.com.br/ambiental and https://www.migplus.com.br/governanca use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 10 pages without an H1

    https://www.migplus.com.br/representantes, https://www.migplus.com.br/sobre, https://www.migplus.com.br/sustentabilidade, https://www.migplus.com.br/social, https://www.migplus.com.br/ambiental and https://www.migplus.com.br/governanca and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 27 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 9270
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://blooper.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/header.png.

  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 34 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 429 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 429 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at migplus.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 39 issues on migplus.com.br, including 15 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25