Website review, no card needed

miliboo.com logo

miliboo.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202645 issues · 87 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on miliboo.com, 12 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.7 sMay 2Oct 171.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.7 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
164 ms140 msMay 2Oct 17144 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026145 ms
May 9, 2026146 ms
May 16, 2026146 ms
May 23, 2026146 ms
May 30, 2026145 ms
Jun 6, 2026144 ms
Jun 13, 2026144 ms
Jun 20, 2026145 ms
Jun 27, 2026152 ms
Jul 4, 2026156 ms
Jul 11, 2026160 ms
Jul 18, 2026161 ms
Jul 25, 2026157 ms
Aug 1, 2026154 ms
Aug 8, 2026152 ms
Aug 15, 2026147 ms
Aug 22, 2026145 ms
Aug 29, 2026144 ms
Sep 5, 2026144 ms
Sep 12, 2026145 ms
Sep 19, 2026144 ms
Sep 26, 2026144 ms
Oct 3, 2026144 ms
Oct 10, 2026143 ms
Oct 17, 2026144 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of miliboo.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. miliboo.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. miliboo.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. miliboo.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. miliboo.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  5. miliboo.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  6. miliboo.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  7. miliboo.com at 6.2 s6.2 s
  8. miliboo.com at 7.0 s7.0 s

Speed

12 to fix56
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    11.3 s · 8.1 MB

    78 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.1 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    3.5 s · 1.4 MB

    10 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.8 s · 697 KiB

    About 697 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.3 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

  • Font display

    1.3 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.3 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 56

    56/100

    Your mobile performance score is 56 (desktop: 53). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Trust Pilot and others), adding 1.3 MB and 518 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 67 KiB

    About 67 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    300 ms · 60 KiB

    60 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 235 ms

    235 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 235 ms of main-thread work and 371 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,512 HTML elements

    The page has 1,512 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google CDN adds 63 ms

    63 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 63 ms of main-thread work and 347 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 32 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 105 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    10 KiB

    10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 556 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 34 ms

    34 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 37.2 s

    37.2 s

    Your largest element takes 37.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 38.8 s

    38.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 38.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.4 s

    11.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.135

    0.135

    The layout shifts by 0.135 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 20 images without width and height

    20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 191 ms

    191 ms

    Real visitors wait 191 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 666 ms

    666 ms

    Real visitors wait 666 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 99 ms

    99 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 99 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix50
  • Page weight: 9.2 MB in 136 requests

    9.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.2 MB in 136 requests on a phone: images 7.3 MB (53), scripts 1.4 MB (40) and fonts 330 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 25 images in older formats

    25 images (4.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    28 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example tendance3.jpg at 700 px wide, shown at 230 px. Resized copies would save about 28 KiB.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (278 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.61 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.61 g of CO₂e: 312.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fix80
  • 12 images without alt text

    12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 29 links without text

    29 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Hidden but focusable

    14 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes

    Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes (1 element).

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8381
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.miliboo.com/sitemap/sitemap_index_fr.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 284 internal links, 21 external

    The homepage links to 284 pages on miliboo.com and 21 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 156 characters

    Your meta description is 156 characters: “La livraison est gratuite sur tout le site! A la recherche de meubles design ? Découvrez une sélection de mobilier desi…”.

  • Title: 44 characters

    Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Meuble design et mobilier pas cher - Miliboo”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.miliboo.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,334 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.miliboo.com/milibootiks-connectees.html and https://www.miliboo.com/mon-panier.html are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.miliboo.com/mon-panier.html has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.miliboo.com/espace-pro.html and https://www.miliboo.com/contact.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.miliboo.com/espace-pro.html, https://www.miliboo.com/contact.html and https://www.miliboo.com/mon-panier.html have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.miliboo.com/milibootiks-connectees.html and https://www.miliboo.com/espace-pro.html took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 125 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    7 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 9270
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.miliboo.com/.

  • 22 small tap targets

    22 of 63 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 4 distorted images

    4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 398 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 398 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Aide & Contact”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at miliboo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on miliboo.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25