Website review, no card needed
miodottore.it website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202643 issues · 90 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on miodottore.it, 20 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for MioDottore
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 339 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 338 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 339 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 340 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 343 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 346 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 347 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 349 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 346 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 341 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 335 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 332 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 337 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 341 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 261 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.6 s · 1.2 MB60 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.1 s · 852 KiBAbout 852 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
4,153 HTML elements
The page has 4,153 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (docplanner.com, Google Tag Manager and cookiepro.com and others), adding 1.7 MB and 982 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
650 ms · 83 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 83 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.
docplanner.com adds 564 ms
564 msdocplanner.com costs a phone 564 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 280 ms
280 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 280 ms of main-thread work and 203 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 223 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 59 KiBAbout 59 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Document request latency
172 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Improve image delivery
100 KiB1 image could be 100 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify JavaScript
18 KiB18 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 39 ms
39 msYour server sent the HTML in 39 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 12.2 s
12.2 sYour largest element takes 12.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Trova il tuo medico e prenota un appuntamento. Scarica l'Ap…”.
Time to Interactive: 12.4 s
12.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 761 ms
761 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 761 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 252 ms
252 msReal visitors wait 252 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.7 s
5.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
27 images without width and height
27 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 536 ms
536 msReal visitors wait 536 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 23% faster for real visitors
-23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 339 ms to 261 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit
0.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.54 g of CO₂e: 64.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.9 MB in 75 requests
1.9 MBYour homepage downloads 1.9 MB in 75 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (47), HTML 257 KiB (1) and images 128 KiB (5). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (3 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Invalid ARIA attributes
2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 27 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 12 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
238 internal links, 31 external
The homepage links to 238 pages on miodottore.it and 31 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 144 characters
Your meta description is 144 characters: “Cerca i medici suggeriti e le cliniche suggerite della tua città. Leggi le recensioni, controlla le informazioni e pren…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Prenota la tua visita online!”.
Title: 63 characters
Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “MioDottore.it - Trova un dottore e prenota la tua visita online”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.miodottore.it/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.miodottore.it/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.miodottore.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,291 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.miodottore.it/gdpr/patient-data is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.miodottore.it/gdpr/patient-data all use the title “MioDottore.it - Trova un dottore e prenota la tua visita online”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without an H1
https://www.miodottore.it/registrazione-medico has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 197 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
27 small tap targets
27 of 42 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://platform.docplanner.com/css/FullPageWithLogo-rs-77dc8e05.css' from origin 'https:/…”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,024 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,024 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at miodottore.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Hiring
- Hiring
- 21 open roles
- Teams
- MioDottore (21)
- Job board
- ashby
- Careers page
- jobs.ashbyhq.com/miodottore (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on miodottore.it, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.