Website review, no card needed
mipequeno.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202642 issues · 80 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on mipequeno.com, 20 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70C- #83,891 of 100,140 reviewed websitesbeats 14%
- #49,524 of 55,068 online storesbeats 8%
- #91 of 145 PrestaShop storesbeats 34%
Closest competitors among PrestaShop stores
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.4 s
2.8 s
4.2 s
5.6 s
7.0 s
8.4 s
9.7 s
11.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
19.4 s · 5.4 MB169 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.4 MB).
Render-blocking requests
18.4 s96 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 18.4 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.6 s · 984 KiBAbout 984 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.6 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
4.4 s · 1.0 MB10 images could be 1.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.4 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
4.6 s · 772 KiBAbout 772 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.6 s faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
2.2 s · 361 KiB361 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
990 ms · 164 KiB164 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Mobile performance score: 54
54/100Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Font display
800 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 800 ms).
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 323 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 166 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
148 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Bootstrap CDN, Google Fonts and wikimedia.org), adding 119 KiB and 4 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 439 ms
439 msYour server sent the HTML in 439 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 19.1 s
19.1 sThe first text or image appears after 19.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 29.0 s
29.0 sYour largest element takes 29.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Iniciar sesión Mi cuenta Política de uso de datos Llámenos …”.
Speed Index: 23.1 s
23.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 23.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 29.2 s
29.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
2 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 140 ms
140 msScripts block the page for only 140 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.013
0.013The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.013, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.7 MB in 178 requests
5.7 MBYour homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 178 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (74), scripts 1.7 MB (43) and stylesheets 956 KiB (53). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
logo-1774472091.jpg weighs 926 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
1 image far larger than shown
875 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example logo-1774472091.jpg at 4,000 px wide, shown at 312 px. Resized copies would save about 875 KiB.
7 images in older formats
7 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
19 images below the first screen load straight away
19 images further down the page (571 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.62 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.62 g of CO₂e: 194.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
24 buttons without a name
24 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
13 text elements with low contrast
13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
44 links without text
44 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.mipequeno.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
172 internal links, 3 external
The homepage links to 172 pages on mipequeno.com and 3 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Compra artículos de bebé baratos online o en Granada. Cochecitos, sillas de coche y outlet con envío a toda España. ¡As…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Cochecitos y Artículos de Bebé Baratos Online | Tienda Física en Granada con Envío a Toda España”.
Title: 57 characters
Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “▷ Cochecitos y Artículos de Bebé Baratos Granada y Online”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mipequeno.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.mipequeno.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,466 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 linked pages hidden from search
https://www.mipequeno.com/carrito and https://www.mipequeno.com/pedido are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
https://www.mipequeno.com/carrito and https://www.mipequeno.com/pedido all use the title “Carrito”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.mipequeno.com/carrito and https://www.mipequeno.com/pedido have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.mipequeno.com/306-sillas-coche-grupo-01, https://www.mipequeno.com/307-sillas-coche-grupo-23 and https://www.mipequeno.com/342-sillas-coche-grupo-123 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 137 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
13 small tap targets
13 of 45 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 25 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 342 words of copy
The homepage carries about 342 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mipequeno.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- PrestaShop
- Hosting
- Comvive Servidores S.L.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on mipequeno.com, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.