Website review, no card needed

mirati.com logo

mirati.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202630 issues · 78 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on mirati.com, 14 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: 2 images over 500 KB. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.2 sMay 9Oct 242.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
164 ms120 msMay 9Oct 24130 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026156 ms
May 16, 2026159 ms
May 23, 2026155 ms
May 30, 2026153 ms
Jun 6, 2026150 ms
Jun 13, 2026147 ms
Jun 20, 2026145 ms
Jun 27, 2026142 ms
Jul 4, 2026140 ms
Jul 11, 2026136 ms
Jul 18, 2026134 ms
Jul 25, 2026132 ms
Aug 1, 2026129 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 15, 2026127 ms
Aug 22, 2026126 ms
Aug 29, 2026125 ms
Sep 5, 2026125 ms
Sep 12, 2026127 ms
Sep 19, 2026129 ms
Sep 26, 2026130 ms
Oct 3, 2026130 ms
Oct 10, 2026130 ms
Oct 17, 2026129 ms
Oct 24, 2026130 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mirati.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mirati.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. mirati.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. mirati.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. mirati.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. mirati.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. mirati.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. mirati.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. mirati.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix58
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.9 s · 1.5 MB

    33 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.6 s · 488 KiB

    About 488 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    760 ms · 187 KiB

    About 187 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 760 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    760 ms · 163 KiB

    163 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, Adobe Tag Manager and Qualtrics and others), adding 2.4 MB and 230 ms of main-thread time.

  • q4web.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    q4web.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    216 KiB

    6 images could be 216 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 27 KiB

    27 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 144 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 441 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 11 ms

    11 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 26.9 s

    26.9 s

    Your largest element takes 26.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Atiba smiling”.

  • Time to Interactive: 27.6 s

    27.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 27.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.3 s

    5.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.18

    0.18

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 849 ms

    849 ms

    Real visitors wait 849 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Real visitors wait 111 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 156 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 130 ms

    130 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 130 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 75.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    10.3 MB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 3d_cell_receptor_1080x1080.gif at 1,080 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 10.3 MB.

  • Page weight: 5.2 MB in 79 requests

    5.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 79 requests on a phone: other files 2.1 MB (14), images 1.6 MB (40) and scripts 939 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (76.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (53.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.47 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.47 g of CO₂e: 176.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9598
  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8588
  • Meta description is long (166 characters)

    Your meta description is 166 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Structured data has 3 problems

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite) but with 3 problems, for example “Organization: sameAs is an empty list”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 95 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 95 pages on mirati.com and 9 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “World-class science. Life-changing impact.”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Bristol Myers Squibb - Global Biopharmaceutical Company”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.bms.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.bms.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.bms.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (490 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.bms.com/life-and-science/science/coordinating-clinical-trials-to-advance-medicines-through-gps.html and https://www.bms.com/life-and-science/science/patient-driven-therapy-design-and-product-development.html have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 71 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    14 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 497 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 497 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us” and “Contact us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mirati.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Imperva

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on mirati.com, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25