Website review, no card needed
miratorg.ru website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202656 issues · 101 checks
This review found 56 issues worth fixing on miratorg.ru, 25 of them high impact, across 101 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
61DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 108 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 109 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.7 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.7 s.
Font display
1.1 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31 (desktop: 66). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
2.0 MB11 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused JavaScript
600 ms · 715 KiBAbout 715 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Document request latency
950 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 950 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 181 KiBAbout 181 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Avoid multiple page redirects
810 msThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 810 ms. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 176 KiB176 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 663 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Yandex CDN adds 99 ms
99 msYandex CDN costs a phone 99 ms of main-thread work and 306 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (yandex.ru, Yandex CDN and Yandex Metrica and others), adding 711 KiB and 316 ms of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 22 KiB22 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 119 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
57 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (57 KiB).
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 66 but mobile only 31. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.8 s
4.8 sReal visitors wait 4.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.61
0.61For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.61 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 4.4 s
4.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors wait 3.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.5 s
8.5 sYour largest element takes 8.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (4.0 s).
Speed Index: 14.4 s
14.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 21.5 s
21.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.654
0.654The layout shifts by 0.654 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s
4.5 sThe first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 49% slower for real visitors
+49%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 3.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 108 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 112 ms
112 msReal visitors wait 112 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 173 ms
173 msScripts block the page for only 173 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.5 MB in 128 requests
12.5 MBYour homepage downloads 12.5 MB in 128 requests on a phone: images 10.7 MB (50), scripts 1.3 MB (38) and fonts 301 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images in older formats
5 images (505 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit
3.54 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.54 g of CO₂e: 424.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
12 text elements with low contrast
12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (3 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (2 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (2 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (12 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (1 element)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 87 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 13 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (14 characters)
Your title is only 14 characters: “Мы одна страна”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Аренда и оказание услуг по сельхозоборудованию”, “Возьмем в аренду сельхозтехнику” and “Производство желатина”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
8 links with vague text
8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
44 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 44 pages on miratorg.ru and 10 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “Официальный сайт АПХ «Мираторг», крупнейшего российского производителя высококачественной свинины, говядины и премиальн…”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://miratorg.ru/newsitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
2%A phone browser shows 1,190 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 20. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://miratorg.ru/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler
robots.txt blocks CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
8 pages share a meta description
https://miratorg.ru/contacts, https://miratorg.ru/purchasegrain, https://miratorg.ru/procurement and https://miratorg.ru/luch use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
10 pages without an H1
https://miratorg.ru/products/brand/arendaiuslugi, https://miratorg.ru/products/brand/zhelatin, https://miratorg.ru/products/brand/proizvodstvo-kombikormov, https://miratorg.ru/products/brand/osmotr, https://miratorg.ru/purchasegrain and https://miratorg.ru/burger-n-fries and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 pages with very little text
https://miratorg.ru/about, https://miratorg.ru/contacts, https://miratorg.ru/products/brand/arendaiuslugi, https://miratorg.ru/products/brand/zhelatin, https://miratorg.ru/products/brand/proizvodstvo-kombikormov and https://miratorg.ru/products/brand/osmotr and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
3 pages slow to respond
https://miratorg.ru/about, https://miratorg.ru/products/brand/arendaiuslugi and https://miratorg.ru/products/brand/zhelatin took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Bad element for Flickity: null”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,190 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,190 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at miratorg.ru, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 56 issues on miratorg.ru, including 23 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.