Website review, no card needed

mizodia.com logo

mizodia.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202628 issues · 78 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on mizodia.com, 8 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s1.7 sMay 16Oct 312.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Oct 31, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
205 ms162 msMay 16Oct 31195 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026167 ms
May 23, 2026168 ms
May 30, 2026171 ms
Jun 6, 2026175 ms
Jun 13, 2026179 ms
Jun 20, 2026181 ms
Jun 27, 2026183 ms
Jul 4, 2026183 ms
Jul 11, 2026178 ms
Jul 18, 2026183 ms
Jul 25, 2026180 ms
Aug 1, 2026178 ms
Aug 8, 2026181 ms
Aug 15, 2026180 ms
Aug 22, 2026183 ms
Aug 29, 2026189 ms
Sep 5, 2026191 ms
Sep 12, 2026192 ms
Sep 19, 2026200 ms
Sep 26, 2026196 ms
Oct 3, 2026196 ms
Oct 10, 2026194 ms
Oct 17, 2026188 ms
Oct 24, 2026195 ms
Oct 31, 2026195 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mizodia.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mizodia.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. mizodia.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. mizodia.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. mizodia.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. mizodia.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. mizodia.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. mizodia.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  8. mizodia.com at 3.4 s3.4 s

Speed

7 to fix52
  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    700 ms

    25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    100 ms · 341 KiB

    12 images could be 341 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    406 KiB

    About 406 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 300 ms

    300 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 300 ms of main-thread work and 327 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,726 HTML elements

    The page has 2,726 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and 9gtb.com and others), adding 901 KiB and 498 ms of main-thread time.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 198 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    48 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (48 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 11 ms

    11 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 11 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Your largest element takes 7.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.8 s

    13.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 684 ms

    684 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 684 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 167 ms to 195 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 198 ms

    198 ms

    Real visitors wait 198 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 626 ms

    626 ms

    Real visitors wait 626 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.2 MB in 164 requests

    2.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 164 requests on a phone: images 919 KiB (25), scripts 890 KiB (82) and fonts 131 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    29 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Fingerabdruck-Kette-mit-zwei-Abdrucken-Anker-Kugelkette-GOLD at 600 px wide, shown at 173 px. Resized copies would save about 29 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (65 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (32 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.62 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.62 g of CO₂e: 74.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9793
  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 11 images without alt text

    11 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (16 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 3 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“” and “Personal jewelry for the people who mean the most…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 201 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 201 pages on mizodia.com and 7 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 129 characters

    Your meta description is 129 characters: “Emotional jewelry with engraving: zodiac signs, handwriting, fingerprint & more. Discover & gift personalized jewelry o…”.

  • Title: 41 characters

    Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Buy personalized jewelry online | Mizodia”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://mizodia.com/en-us.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://mizodia.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,544 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://mizodia.com/llms.txt (195 KiB, 778 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://mizodia.com/en-us/collections/all has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://mizodia.com/collections/portrait-engraving, whose canonical is https://mizodia.com/en-us/collections/portrait-engraving. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 127 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    3 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    42 of 45 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 653 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 653 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Sign up” and “Shop now”.

  • 8 short forms

    8 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 93 testimonial or review blocks, 1 customer or partner logo, a star rating and “2,500+ reviews”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Xandr (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mizodia.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Pandectes Gdpr · Simple Affiliate · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · T Lab Ai Translate · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Okendo · Triplewhale · Elevar Conversion Tracking · Avada Aeo Optimizer · Geolocation Orbe · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Orbe Geolocation · Trueprofit

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 28 issues on mizodia.com, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25