Website review, no card needed
mkb.hu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202633 issues · 65 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on mkb.hu, 15 of them high impact, across 65 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
62DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 210 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 210 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 208 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 222 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
8.6 s · 4.4 MB31 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.4 MB).
Improve image delivery
9.3 s · 1.8 MB6 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.9 s · 873 KiBAbout 873 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Mobile performance score: 19
19/100Your mobile performance score is 19. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Google/Doubleclick Ads), adding 573 KiB and 667 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 667 ms
667 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 667 ms of main-thread work and 568 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 77 KiBAbout 77 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 368 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 18 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.7 s
A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Document request latency
189 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 316 ms
316 msYour server sent the HTML in 316 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.66
0.66For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.66 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 40.8 s
40.8 sYour largest element takes 40.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “MBH Otthon Start Lakáshitel kedvezményes kamattal 11.15-ig …”.
Time to Interactive: 42.4 s
42.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 42.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.777
0.777The layout shifts by 0.777 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 9.9 s
9.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 826 ms
826 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 826 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 238 ms
238 msReal visitors wait 238 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
18 images without width and height
18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 210 ms to 222 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 521 ms
521 msReal visitors wait 521 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.5 MB in 46 requests
11.5 MBYour homepage downloads 11.5 MB in 46 requests on a phone: images 8.4 MB (22), scripts 1.6 MB (6) and fonts 1.0 MB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit
3.27 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.27 g of CO₂e: 392.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
12 links without text
12 links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.
Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (4 elements).
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 23 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (8 characters)
Your title is only 8 characters: “MBH Bank”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at mbhbank.hu/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
148 internal links, 50 external
The homepage links to 148 pages on mkb.hu and 50 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 160 characters
Your meta description is 160 characters: “Bank hitelek, bankszámlák, bankkártyák, befektetések, finanszírozás megtakarítások és biztosítások. Bankfiók és atm ker…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.mbhbank.hu/lakossagi.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mbhbank.hu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Other pages
3 linked pages are broken
Your homepage links to https://www.mbhbank.hu/fiokkereso, https://www.mbhbank.hu/bankszunnap and https://www.mbhbank.hu/bankbiztonsag, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.mbhbank.hu/sajtoszoba and https://www.mbhbank.hu/fenntarthatosag-tarsadalmi-felelossegvallalas have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 79 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Blocked by cross-origin policy”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 8,256 words of copy
The homepage carries about 8,256 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “MBH Otthon Start Lakáshitel”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mkb.hu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Founded
- 1950
- Headquarters
- Budapest
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on mkb.hu, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.